Skip to main content
LawSphereX

ROHITASH GAHLOT v. STATE OF RAJSTHAN

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: FARJAND ALI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-14. ROHITASH GAHLOT v. STATE OF RAJSTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[2025:RJ-JD:9234] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 1366/2025 Rohitash Gahlot S/o Ravindra Gehlot, Aged About 29 Years, R/o East Street, Near Alakh Sagar Well, Bikaner, Po Bikaner, Dist. Bikaner,raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajsthan, Through Pp 2. Subhash Legha S/o Bhanwar Lal, R/o Khaturiya Colony, Bikaner, Jnv Colonybikaner,raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shree Kant Verma Mr. Anil Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, Dy. G. A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order 14/02/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the instant petition. However, he seeks liberty for the petitioner to submit a representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police with appropriate directions to decide the same and issue necessary instructions to the concerned Investigating Officer. 2.

Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police averring therein all the grounds which have been raised in this petition within a period of 20 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. Till the representation is filed within the stipulated time as directed above, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection [2025:RJ-JD:9234] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1366/2025] with FIR No. 149/2022 registered at the Police Station Jai Narayan Vyas Colony, District Bikaner so as to enable him to submit the representation. 4. In the event, the representation is submitted, the concerned Superintendent of Police is directed to minutely and objectively consider the contents of the same and thereafter, issue necessary instructions to the Investigating Officer. All the relevant documents with the representation shall also be taken into consideration.

The representation shall be decided within a period of 20 days from the date of receipt of the same. 5. Needless to say that in the event, the grievance of the petitioner persists, he would be at liberty to approach this Court again. 6. Stay petition also stands dismissed. (FARJAND ALI),J 167-chhavi/-

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.