Skip to main content
LawSphereX

State Rep. By Inspector of Police, v. Smt. M.Rama Devi

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K.SURENDER

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-27. State Rep. By Inspector of Police, v. Smt. M.Rama Devi. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

132511 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENry SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,SURENDER l. A. Nos. O2 and 03 OF 2016 (C RL. A. M. P. Nos. 966 and 14284 ol 20161 IN/AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 216 OF 2025 Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(3) & (1) of Cr. P. C. , against the Judoment dated 19102120'15 passed in C. C. No. '123 of 2010 on the file of the Court of thie Second Additional Special Judge for SPE and Cases at Hyderabad. Between: State Rep. by lnspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Warangal Range, Warangal. ... AppellanUComplainant in l. A. Nos. 2 &3 of 2016 AND Smt. M. Rama Devi, Wo. Papa Rao, Occ:Data Entry Operator, O/o. Asst. Engineer, A. P. State Housing Corporation Limited Ghanpur Station, Warangal District. ... RespondenUAccused Officer -2 in l. A. Nos. 2 &3 of 2016 l. A. No: 2 oF 2016(cRLAlt P,--Noi-900-oE2!

lO) Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act paaying that in the circumstances filed stated in the affidavit in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 43 days in filing the appeal against the Acquittal of the Respondent / AO herein for the offence under Sections 7 & 13(1) (d) of prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in CC. No. 123 of 2010 on the file of the ll Additional Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Hyderabad. l. A. NOI 3 P. NO: 14284 OF 2016) Petition under Section 378(4) CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Special Leave permitting the petitioner to prefer an Appeal against the acquittat for the offence under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1 Xd) of Prevention of '1988 Corruption Act, and U/s 2a8() Cr. P. C. of the Respondent/Accused Officer-2 herein in C. C.

No: 12312010 on the file of the Second Additional Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, HYderabad. Counsel for the Appellant :SRl V RAVI KIRAN RAO, SC Counsel for the Respondents: _ _ _ The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER I. A. Nos. 02 alr^d, 03 0F 2016 CRL. A. M . P. Nos. 966 and 14284 of 2Ot6 IN AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2 16 0F 2025 COMMON JUDGMENT: No representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. This Court, by order dated, 04. 02. 2016 and 15. 07. 2016 in I. A. Nos. 02 and O3 of 2016 (Crl. A. M. p. Nos. 966 and, t4284 of 2Ot6) I directed the issuance of notice to the respondent and file proof of servlce. 3. Till date, neither the proof of service filed nor any proof to show that the notices were sent to the respondent, in accordance I with the directions of this Court. 4. Therefore, I. A. Nos. O2 and 03 of 2O16 (CRL. A. M. p. Nos. 966 I and 14284 of 20761 are dismissed. 5.

Consequently, the Criminal Appeal stands dismissed Miscellareous applications pending, if aly, shall stand closed. I 6. In view of the judgment reported in Sgam Dond. iga u. State of Andhra Prad. eshl, the Registry is directed to number the appeal SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR t \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER U To, l. TheSecondAdditionalspecialJudgeforSPEandCasesatHyderabad 2. One CC to Sri V Ravi Kiran Rao, SC [OPUC] 3. Two CD CoPies ADK/PSL HIGH COUR'T ( DATED:2711212024 I I COMMON JUDGMENT l. A. NOs. 2 and 3 of 2016 (CRL. A. M. P. NOs. 966 and 14284 OF 2016) IN/AND li I . t1 ,, . -- \ ,{. CRLA. No. 216 of 2025 (- 3! ;ilri 2[25 o ( :- Dr ! , ! ' SpArC$ DISMISSING THE CRLA AND l. A. Nos. 2 & 3 of 2016

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.