NITTAN SHARMA v. PIYUSH SINGLA SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT JAMMU AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-12-31. NITTAN SHARMA v. PIYUSH SINGLA SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT JAMMU AND OTHERS. Read the...
Judgment text
S. No. 50 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case No. :-CCP(S) No. 74/2024 in WP(C) No. 2008/2019 Nittan Sharma ….. Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Vikram Arora, Advocate vice Mr. K. Nirmal Kotwal, Advocate. Vs. Piyush Singla, Secretary School Education ….. Respondent(s) Deptt. Jammu and ors. Through: Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 31. 12. 2024 1. The instant contempt petition has been preferred for willful disobedience of the interim order dated 28. 05. 2019, by virtue of which, the respondent No. 1 has been directed to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner and forwarded by the Director School Education, Jammu vide his No. DSEJ/NG/Tr/7045 dated 26. 02. 2019 and consideration order to be passed was required to be placed on record along with objections. 2.
Since the aforesaid order was not complied with, the instant contempt petition has been preferred against the said interim order and notice in the instant contempt petition was issued on 18. 03. 2024. 3. Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, learned GA assures this Court that the aforesaid interim order shall be complied with and, accordingly, he seeks two weeks’ time to do the needful. 4. In light of the assurance extended by the learned counsel for the respondents, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the instant contempt petition pending. The same is, accordingly, disposed of by directing the respondent-Director School Education, Jammu to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner, which has been forwarded by the Director School Education, Jammu vide his No. DSEJ/NG/Tr/7045 dated 26. 02. 2019 and the order of consideration, which is likely to be passed, be forwarded to the petitioner through registered post. 5.
In view of the above, the instant contempt petition is disposed of as settled and contempt proceedings are, accordingly, closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 31. 12. 2024 Ram Krishan Ram Krishan 2024. 12. 23 02:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.