SMT RATHNAMMA C v. SRI S HANUMANTHEGOWDA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-02-06. SMT RATHNAMMA C v. SRI S HANUMANTHEGOWDA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - RFA No. 2917 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 6 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2917 OF 2024 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RATHNAMMA. C W/O SRINIVAS. N. , AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2. SRI. SRINIVAS. N S/O S. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 3. SRI. NAVEEN S/O SRINIVAS. N. , AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT: NO. 84, WARD NO. 11, PARVATHAPURA, MARLUBAGILU, DEVANAHALLI, TOWN-562 110. …APPELLANTS Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA (BY SRI. JAGADEESHA. K. G. , ADVOCATE) M R Location: High AND: Court of Karnataka 1. SRI. S. HANUMANTHEGOWDA S/O LATE SONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT MEENUKUNTE HOSURU, DODDAJALA POST, BENGALURU RURAL-562 157. 2. SRI. SELVAKUMAR, S/O E. K. BENJAMIN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, - 2 - RFA No. 2917 of 2024 R/AT: H. W. HOUSE NO. 2-171, GUTTAKINDURU VILLAGE, KINNATAMPALLI POST, CHITTORE POST, ANDRA PRADESH-517 422. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANIKETHANA. K. M. , ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VARAPRASAD.
K. , ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt. Vachana. , counsel on behalf of Sri. Jagadeesha. K. G. , for the appellants appeared in person and seeks time to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is plain. The appeal is listed today for non-compliance of office objections. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the objections raised at the scrutiny stage are not yet complied with. The appeal is filed in the year 2024. Now we are in the month of February, 2025. It's almost one year, the office objections are not complied with. Despite the grant of time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, - 3 - RFA No.
2917 of 2024 the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No. : 1 Sl No. : 8
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.