M/S COLONEL SHISHUPAL SECURITY CONSULTANCY AND SERVICES AND ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2025-08-18. M/S COLONEL SHISHUPAL SECURITY CONSULTANCY AND SERVICES AND ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. Read the...
Judgment text
Serial No. 35 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 85 of 2025 Date of Decision: 18. 08. 2025 1. M/s Colonel Shishupal Security Consultancy & Services Represented by Shri Venu Shishupal Pariat, R/o Goenka Tower, Keating Road, Shillong-793001, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 2. Shri Venu Shishupal Pariat, S/o (L) Shishupal R. Pariat, R/o Gora Lane Laitumkhrah, Shillong-793003, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Union of India represented by Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi-110001. 2. Government e-Market Place (GeM), Government e-Market Place, Represented by Shri Ajay Bhadoo, nd 2 Floor, Jeevan Tara Building, 5-Sansad Marg, Near Patel Chowk, New Delhi-110001. 3. The Director of NEIGRIHMS, NEIGRIHMS, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong-793018 East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 4.
The Deputy Director of NEIGRIHMS, NEIGRIHMS, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong-793018 East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 5. Ranger Security & Service Organisation (RSSO), Represented by Smti Wanjoplin Nongsteng, Mawlai Phudmuri, Shillong-793008, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. … Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. Kharsyad, Adv. vice Mr. T. T. Diengdoh, Sr. Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. M. Myrchiang, Adv. (For R 1,3&4) vice Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI Mr. R. Kharkrang, Adv. vice Mr. A. Tiwari, Adv. (For R 2) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: (ORAL) 1. Mr. R. Kharsyad, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition as there are other developments that have since occurred, with a liberty to file afresh. 2. The same is not objected by the learned counsel for the respondents. 3.
Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however with a liberty to file afresh if any cause of action arises. JUDGE Meghalaya 18. 08. 2025 “V. Lyndem-PS”
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.