SRI MANJUGOWDA K V v. THE TAHSHILDAR
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: R DEVDAS
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-03-06. SRI MANJUGOWDA K V v. THE TAHSHILDAR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 36111 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 6 DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 36111 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI MANJUGOWDA K V S/O VENKATESHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT NO. 36, SRI RANGA NILAYA, ST TH 1 FLOOR, 10 CROSS CHOWDESHWARI NAGAR, LAGGERE, BANGALORE - 560058. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANILKUMAR H G. ,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHSHILDAR Digitally signed by CHAMARAJANAGAR DHARMALINGAM CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT -571 313. Location: High Court Of Karnataka 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE KOLLEGALA, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT CHAMARAJANAGAR-571 313. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE, - 2 - WP No. 36111 of 2025 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571313. 4. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560001. 5. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT TH ROOM NO. 627, 6 FLOOR, GATE NO. 1, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. P. RADHA. , AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDMUS, IN THE NATURE OF DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS MADE BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS BY THE PETITIONER, IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY. NO 3 (OLD SY. NO. 3/58A) MEASURING AN EXTENT IF 5 ACRES 16 GUNTAS OF LAND SITUATED AT HARADANAHALLI DISTRICT FOREST VILLAGE, CHANDAKVADIHOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT PRODUCED REPRESENTATION AND DOCUMENTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. - 3 - WP No. 36111 of 2025 2. The petitioner is seeking to enter his name in the revenue records pursuant to the registered release deed 22. 07. 2025 and the petitioner has made a representations dated 05. 08.
2025 at Annexures-A, A1 & A2 seeking to enter his name in the revenue records however, no orders have been passed by the Tahsildar, Chamarajanagar District. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Tahsildar, Chamarajanagar District to proceed to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. This Court has passed an order in W. P. No. 2720/2026 dated 10. 02. 2026, having regard to the provisions of the Karnataka Sakaala Services Act, 2011 and costs of Rs. 500/- is levied on the respondent- - 4 - WP No. 36111 of 2025 Tahsildar, Bengaluru North Taluk, payable to the petitioners since the Tahsildar has failed to provide guarantee of services to the petitioners therein within the stipulated time limit in terms of the provisions of Act, 2011. Accordingly, costs of Rs.
500/- is levied on the respondent-Tahsildar, in the present case also. The costs shall be paid along with the copy of the order that would be furnished, by the respondent-Tahsildar to the petitioner. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.