M/S SRI VENKATESHWARA COOP FARMING SCTY,HYD,AND 11 OTRS v. JNT COLLECTOR,HYD,AND 5 OTRS
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-09. M/S SRI VENKATESHWARA COOP FARMING SCTY,HYD,AND 11 OTRS v. JNT COLLECTOR,HYD,AND 5 OTRS. Read...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION N O: 33103 OF 201l Between: ) 1. M/s Sri Venkateshwara Co-operative Farminq Societv. reo. bv its Trustees 2. Bee Bee Khatoon, Dio late Himmath Ali Khan, Rd)O a'boul 60 vears. Household, r/o 16-4-365, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad, A. p. 3. Jeevan Khatoon, D/o.. Himmath Ali Khan, Aged about 59 years, latg Household, r/o 16-3-536, Chanchalguda, Hyderaba-d, A. p. 4. Shoukath Ali Khan Alizai, S/o tateHimmaiih Ali Khan, Aged about 50 Occ: Business, r/o 16-3-530, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad, A. p. 5. lnayath D{o- Himmath Ati Xnari, Aged 6bout [fratgo1, 49 years, latg Household, rlo 16-4-260, Chanchalguda, HyderabaE, A. p. 6. Shama! Khatoon,. Dlg t_{ayaJh KhStoon Alizai lqba'i Bhanu, Aged about ygqrs, Occ_: Household, r/o 16-3-839, Chanchalguija, _ Hyderabad]A. p. -about 7.
Habeen Khatoon, Wo Late Yousuf Ali Khan, Aged years, F2 Household. 8. Amjad Ali Khan, S/o Late Yousuf Ali Khan, Aged about 34 years, Business. 9. Khatoon, D/o Late Yousuf Ali Khan, 9akina Aged about 33 years, Household. 10. Malik MansoorAli Khan, S/o Late Yousuf Ali Khan, Aged about 32 years, Business. 11. Ayesha Khatoon, D/o Late Yousuf Ali Khan, Aged about 30 years, Household. 12. Mraj Khaloon, D/o Late Yousuf Ali Khan, Aged about 28 years, Household, (Above 7 to 12 arc R/o 16-3-35/4, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad, A. p. ) All are_ by their q. P. A. Sri N. B. Ramaiah, S/o Late Sd N. Jaganatham, -rep. 4! y. rs, Business, Ryo 10-4-38/4, Humayun Nagar, ? ge{ Qcc Ma-sab Hyderabad, A. P. ... PETITIONERS AND 1. Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. 2. Revenue Divisional Officer, East Division, Hyderabad. 3. Bantu Yadagiri, S/o Late Sri Ramulu, Occ: Business, Aged Major, 4. Bantu Ramulamma, Wo Sri Ramulu, Occ: Household, Aded Major. _Late 5.
Bantu Yellaiah, S/o Late Sri Narayana, Occ: Business, Aged lrlajor. 6. Bantu Laxmaiah, S/o Late Sri Narayana, Occ: Business, Aged Major, All are Rl/o H. No. 7-78, Srinagar Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, R. R. District, A. P. (Since the Conditional Order of the Court dt:1 6-04-20'1 5 has not been tomplied with, the default clause of the said order has been Given Effect to, and ihe WP accordingly stands dismissed as against Respondent Nos. 3 & 6) ,.. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dt. 06. 05. 2011 passed by the 1st respondent in Appeal No. F11705/2009, whereby the order dt. 17. 12. 1988 passed by the 2nd respondent in File No. L/4404/1988, was confirmed and quash the same. l. A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP.
NO: 41134OF 20111 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order d1. 06. 05. 201 1 passed by the 1st respondent in Appeal No. F11705/2009 and the otdet dt. 17. 12. 1988 passed by the 2nd respondent in File No. L/4404/1988 pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI S. SASIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 TO 6: --t I The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH IIIRIT PETITION No. 331 O3 of2O11 , ORDER: This writ petition is coming for hearing since 2011. lL. Il. 2O24 when the matter was called, there was representation on behalf of the petitioners, and therefore, matter was directed to be listed on 02-12. 2024 under caption "for dismissal". Today i. e. , 09. 12. 2024, when matter is called, there is no representation on behalf petitioners.
It seems that the petitioners are not interested prosecute this case. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed Non-prosecution/default. There shall be no order as to 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any in petition, shall stand closed. SD/. L. LAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1. One CC to SRI S. SASIDHAR REDDY, Advocate toPSUt"% of Telangana, at i. il; ccsio op ron REVENUE, High court for the Hyderabad. [OUTI 3 Two CD Copies PSK. R*- HIGH COURT DATED:0911212024 _ --: IirAl . -'' :it: (: . / ;f aar ORDER 0:l ii3 2i125 i WP. No. 33103 of 2011 )rt, -l' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION/DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS L fl n. t r-( 6c4^a
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.