BIJI JOLLY, v. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. K. SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-08-05. BIJI JOLLY, v. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM,. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TH MONDAY, THE 5 DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 27695 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: 1 BIJI JOLLY, AGED 45 YEARS W/O JOLLY,KORAMANGALATH HOUSE, KONGORPILLY P. O,KOONAMAVU, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683518 2 IVAN CORREYA, AGED 40 YEARS S/O SEBASTIAN CORREYA, AMBHAT PONJASSERY, PERUMBAVOOR,VENGOLA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683547 BY ADV K. V. GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION KAKKANAD, PIN - 682030 2 K. M SHERIFF, KIZHAKKE ANJIKKATH HOUSE,KANGARAPPADY, V A DACODE, PIN - 682031 SRI. S. GOPINATHAN-SR. GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05. 08. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- “i.
To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the 1 st respondent to convene the timing conference and finalize the timing in respect of the 2 nd respondent service for his varied permit on the route Kavumthazham-Karimugal-Kakkanad- Vyttila in respect of stage carriage KL 17/8668, after taking in to consideration the grievance and objections of the petitioners also. ii. To consider and take appropriate steps in finalization of timing in respect of 2 nd respondent’s service on the varied route by considering Exhibit. P5 and Exhibit. P6 objections, in the interest of justice. ” 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed applications in Exts. P5 and P6. However, no action has been taken on the applications of the petitioner. 3. Mr. S. Gopinathan, the learned Senior Government Pleader submits that, this court may issue directions to the respondent to consider and take necessary decisions on the applications of the petitioner in Exts.
P5 and P6, in accordance with the law, after nd hearing the 2 respondent and other affected parties. Considering the said stand of the learned Government Pleader, the present writ petition is disposed of, with the direction nd to the 2 respondent to take necessary decision on Exts. P5 and P6 applications filed by the petitioner, in accordance with the law. Sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE SJ APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27695/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE IN RESPECT OF THE 1 ST PETITIONER'S SERVICE DATED 03. 05. 2016 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TIMING IN RESPECT OF THE ABOVE SERVICE DATED NILL EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W. P(C)12611 OF 2020 DATED 28. 09. 2020 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1 ST RESPONDENT ISSUING THE PROVISIONAL TIMING TO THE 2 ND RESPONDENT DATED 05. 11. 2020 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE 1 ST PETITIONER DATED 12. 06.
2024 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE LST RESPONDENT DATED 18. 06. 2024
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.