Mohd Abdul Quddus v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-27. Mohd Abdul Quddus v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[3303 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5444 OF 2026 Between 1. Mohd Abdul Quddus, S/o Mohd Abdul Basith, Occ. Private Employee 2. Mohd Abdul Basith, S/o Late Mohd Rasool, Aged about 62 years, Occ. Business, 3. Mohsina, W/o Mohd Abdul Basith, Aged about 54 years, Occ. Household All Fl/o. H. No. 20-4-662, Shahgunj, Hyderabad, Telangana State ... Petitioners ANO 1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana. 2. Mohammed Mahmood Sultan, S/o. Mohd Abdul Rahman, Aged. 43 years, Occ. Private Employee, Fyo. H. No. 20-4-662/8, Shahgunj, Hyderabad, Telangana State. .. Respondents Petition under Section 528 of B. N. S. S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the order dated 06. 04.
2026 passed in Crl. M. P No. 391 of 2026 in Crl. A No. 99 of 2026 by the ll Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad consequently suspend the proceedings passed in M. C. No. B1l234l2i25by the Special Executive Magistrate Hyderabad District pending disposal of the appeal Crl. A No. 99 of 2026 before the ll Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad ry l. A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 528 of B. N. S. S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the order dated 06. 04. i026 passed in crl. M. P No. 391 of 2026 in crt. A No. 99 of 2026 by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad which dismissed the suspension of the order vide M. c. No. 81l234t2o2s passed by the special Executive Magistrate Hyderabad District, and consequently to suspend the order vide M. c. No. 81123412025 passed by the Executive Magistiate Hyderabad Diskict pending disposat of the crt. A No.
99 of 2026 before the ll Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Mohd Azhar, Advocate for the Petitioner and sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, public Additional prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THB STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5444 of 2026 Date:27. 04. 2026 Between: Mohd Abdul Quddus and two others ... Petitioners AND The State of Telangana and another ... Respondents Order This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioners the leamed II aggrieved by the order dated 06. 04. 2026 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in Crl. M. P. No. 39l of 2026 in Crl. Appeal No. 99 of2026 and consequently set aside the proceedings passed in Mc. No. Bl/23412025 dated 16. 12.
2025 by the Special Executive Magistrate, HYderabad. 2. Heard Mr. Mohd Azhar, leamed counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jithendar Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 2. 3. During the course ol hearing, the learned counsel tbr petitioners restricted his retiel seeking a direction to the Trial Court i x lor expeditious disposal of Crl. Appeal No. 99 of 2026 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Ilyderabad, on rhe ground that the said appeal was filed aggrieved by the orders passed in Mc. No. Bl/234/2025 dated 16. 12. 2025 by the. Special Executive Magistrate, Hyderabad. directing the petitioners to execute personal bond for Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) within a period of seven days from the date of the said order. Unless this Court directs the Trial Court to conclude rhe trial and for disposal of the said Crirninal Appeat, bl fixing tirne limit, the petitioners wiil be pur to great hardship. 4.
Leamed Additional public prosecuror has not opposed the submission made bv the leamed counsel for the petitioners. 5. Having considered the submissions made by the respective parties and without expresslng any view, the learned principal Sessions Judge, Hrderabad, is directed to conclude the trial and dispose of Crl. Appeal No. 99 of 2026 as expeditiously as possible pref'erably within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy ol this order. It is made clear that the parties in irs shall cooperate with the trial Court for disposal of Crl. Appeal No. 99 of 2026 without seeking undue adjournments. 6. With the above direction, the Criminat Petition is disposed of, accordingly. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed ISMAIL SD/. MOHD. DEPUTY REGISTRAR /ITRUE COPYI/ SECTION OFFICER To, Judge' Hyderabad' 1. The ll Additional Sessions District Z. ttre Speciat Executive Magistrate Hyderabad Advocate [OPUC] a.
On" CC to Sri MoQd Azhar at High court for the State of Telangana' PuBilc PROSECUTOR +. rwo ccs to HYderabad [OUT] 5. Two CD CoPies TTS/BA c c-t 0p0/ HIGH COURT DATED: 2710412026 o Tti E j4 oR I ,) ,-) m I 0 5 t. l I ? 020 ORDER (. * :1 . ',. CRLP. No. 5444 ot 2026 . I - -":) ' DISPOSING OF THE CRTMINAL PETITION o cp( @ . b 0-> . I 't)
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.