BHAVIKATTI JAMBAPPA (SINCE DECEASED BY LRS) v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-09-04. BHAVIKATTI JAMBAPPA (SINCE DECEASED BY LRS) v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 101831 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH TH DATED THIS THE 4 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101831 OF 2023 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: BHAVIKATTI JAMBAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. , 1. BAVIKATTE HULIGEMMA W/O LATE BAVIKATTE JAMBAPPA, AGE ABOUT 93 YEARS, 2. SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA BAVIKATTE S/O LATE BAVIKATTE JAMBAPPA, AGE ABOUT 59 YEARS, 3. SRINIVAS BHAVIKATTE S/O SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA BAVIKATTE, AGE ABOUT 32 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O: CHITTRAKERE, WARD NO. 26, HOSPET-583 201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR RAIKOTE. , ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-1. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, VIJAYANAGAR, DISTRICT, HOSPET-583 201. - 2 - WP No. 101831 of 2023 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HOSPET SUB DIVISION, SANDUR ROAD, HOSPET-583 201. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, HOSPET URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHITTAVADGI ROAD, HOSPET-583 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.
SHIVAPRABHU. S. HIREMATH. , AGA FOR R1-R3; SRI. C. V. ANGADI. , ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the matter is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 28. 03. 2023, on that day, ten days time was granted to remove all office objections. Despite granting time, office objections are not complied with. The petition is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunity, the - 3 - WP No. 101831 of 2023 office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the petition is filed in the year 2023.
Now we are in the month of September 2024. The petition is pending for almost one year. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP LIST NO. : 2 SL NO. : 6
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.