SARAN SUKH v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2024-10-16. SARAN SUKH v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Petition (T) No. 183 of 2024 th Decided on: 16 October, 2024 __________________________________________________________ Saran Sukh ... Petitioner Versus State of HP & Ors. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For Petitioner: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. C. N. Singh, Advocate. For Respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) Present Execution Petition has been filed for implementation of order dated 09. 10. 2023, passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWPOA No. 6551 of 2020, titled as Saran Sukh v. State of H. P. and others. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 15. 10. 2024, received from Executive Engineer B&R Division Rohru, along with Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 -documents.
3. Copy of office order dated 12. 09. 2024, issued by Engineer-in-Chief, HPPWD, Shimla, has also been placed on record whereby Executive Engineer, HPPWD, Rohru Division, has been directed to take necessary steps for extending the benefits to the petitioner expeditiously. 4. Thereafter, Assistant Engineer, Chirgaon, has communicated to the petitioner vide letter dated 20. 09. 2024, to deposit the amount of Government contribution and dividend received by him from the State Government under the NPS, for considering the case of the petitioner for pension by taking further action by the department. 5. In view of above, the present petition is closed and disposed of with direction to the respondents to ensure taking of further action immediately after depositing of amount by petitioner preferably within two weeks thereafter, to ensure implementation of the judgment in totality.
Needless to say, petitioner shall have an opportunity to approach the Court by taking legal recourse for redressal - 3 - of his grievance(s), if any, including the revival of the present petition. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge October 16, 2024 (Chiranjeev)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.