Smt. Thokala Laxmi Bai W/o Late Sattaiah v. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-10. Smt. Thokala Laxmi Bai W/o Late Sattaiah v. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District,. Read...
Judgment text
[ 3168 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETIT loN NO: 1O848 OF 2008 Between: 1 . Smt. Thokala Laxmi Bai, W/o Late Sattaiah, Housewife R/o 14-8-385/1 3' Jumerath bazar, HYderabad. Gaganpahad 2. Thokala Venkatesh, Sio Late Sattaiah, Business, No 7-4-7 ' Village, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. 3. ThokalaPremKumar,S/oLateSattaiah,Business'eUo'7'4-7'Gaganpahad Village, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District' 4. ThokalaNarsinga,S/oSattaiah,Business'R7o. ,14-8-385/,13'Jumerathbazar' Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND Lakdikapool' Hyderabad' 1. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, & Revenue Division Officer' Chevella 2. Soecial Grade Deputy Collector Division, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District' 3. TheNationalHighwayAuthority,CastleHills,IMasabTankHyderabad,repby A'V Rao' its Technical Manager, Sri its' Commissioner and 4.
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep by Special Officer, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad' ..... RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighcourtmaybe particularly one in----pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, more in declaring the actron of the respondents the nature of writ of Mandamus interfering with tne possession and enjoyment of the land and mulgies bekrnging to the petitioners in R. S. No. 201/2 of Gaganpahad village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R. R. District, as illegal and void and consequenfly restrain them from interfering with the said property without due process of law. l. A. NO:'l OF 2008 (WPMP.
NO :14148 OF 2008) Petition Under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pteased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of land and mulgies in R. S,. No. 20112 of Gaganpahad Village, Rajendranagar mandal, R. R. District pendin,g disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI K. SITA RAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Resprondent No. 3 : SRI M. V. KINI & CO ADVOCATES&SOLICITORS Counsel for the Resp,ondent No. 4 : SRI RApARTHI VENKATESH The Court made the,foltowing ORDER HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No. 1O848 of 2OO8 ORDER: Sri K. Sitaram, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, would submit that in view of the interim order granted by this Court, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive. 2. Recording tl.
e said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. SD/. A. SRINIVASA REODY ASSI T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// E TION OFFICER To l. TwoCC'stoG. PFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hvderabad. (OUT) z oili-cd to SRt r. strR RAM, Advocate toP-ucl- ^. 3. o;; ac i; aRi rr,a. V. krr. rraco ADVocAiES & soLIClroRS Advocate TOPUCI Advocate + b"n"-ct to SRI RAPARTHI VENKATESH' [oPUC] 5. Two CD CoPies SA GJP tvr HIGH COURT DATED:1011212024 ,'. 11-. ',-,, : STAI 4- --, ! " 0 5 flAn 2025 ORDER \rt i'''. \\ 'l:g9r, WP. No. 10848 of 2008 DISMISSING I'HE W. P AS INFRUCTI,IOUS WITHOUT COSTS. a1 l) r IA __-)_ t -- )' llt \z I TT
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.