Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Vodela Suresh Babu v. The State of Telangana And Another

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K.SURENDER

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-01-29. Vodela Suresh Babu v. The State of Telangana And Another. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

\ [3251 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10844 OF 2018 Between: Vodela Suresh Babu, s/O. Jagadeshwar, Aged 48 years, Occ-Computer Mechanic/RTl Activist, R/o. H. No. 8-1 '12, SLNS Colony, Annojiguda (V), Ghatkesar (lvl), Medchal District. ... Petitioner / Accused AND 1. The State of Telangana And Another, Through S. H. O. , P. S. , Ghatkesar. Rep.. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad 2. Smt. Banoth Devi, Wo. Devula, Aged about 48 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 8-33, Sri Lakshmi Narsrmha Nagar Colony, Anooliguda (V), Ghatkesar (M), Medchal-Mlaka. jgiri District ... Respondents / Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P . C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Criminal Proceedings in S. C No.

208 of 2018 in Crime No. B4l20 18 of P. S. , Ghatkesar,. Medchal District, Telangana on the file of the Special SC and STs Ranga Reddy District at L. B. Nagar for the offences Punishable U/s 384,506 IPC and Sec 3('l) (r) (s) of SC and ST (POA) Act,2015 'v l. A. NO: 1 oF 2018 PetitionunderSection4S2ofCr. P. Cprayingthatinthecircumstances statedintheMemor. }ndumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmay of the be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings including appearance of 2018 in Crime No 84/20'18 of in S C No 20B Petitioner and Accused herein p. s. ,Ghatkesar,Me,lchalDistrict,Telanganaonthefileofthespecialscand U/s 384 Lristrrct at L B Nagar for the offences Punishable ' STs Ranga Reddy sc/sT (POA) Act' 2015' (s) of 506 lPCs Sec 3(1)(ri the ltilemorandum of on for hearing, upon perusing This Petition coming of Sri V' and upon hearing the arguments Grounds of Criminal Petition on behalf of the Public Prosecutor the Petitioner and Raghunath, Advocate tor i the Respondent No.

Order:- The Court made the following THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10844 OF 2018 ORDER: 1. This Court, by order, dated 16. 10. 2023 directed the petitioners to take out personal notice to the respondent No. 2 by registered post and acknowledgment due and lile proof of service into the Registry. Till date neither proof of service nor proof of sending the notice is filed, pursuant to the direction of this Court. 2. The petition was filed in the year, 2O 18 and the matrer . underwent several adjournments. Status of the case in the Court below is also not known. 3. In the said circumstances, the Criminal Petition is dismissed on the ground of non-service of notice on the respondent. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. Sd/- A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// / SECTION OFFICER To, . 1 . The Xlll Metropolitan tvlagistrate, Cyberabad at L. B. Nagar' Rangareddy District. 2. The Station House Officer, Ghatkeshwar P. S.

, Rachakonda Commissionerate 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]. 4. One CC to Sri V. Raghunath, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies v(/gh W I HIGH COURI DATED:2910'112025 pE hn€ t t . t 22 itB 206 t a i o€sPAr c, ORDER CRLP. No. 10844 of 2018 DISMISSING HE CRLP gcs'a #t"

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.