Mohd. Vakeel Ahmed v. The State of Telangana and 5 others
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-17. Mohd. Vakeel Ahmed v. The State of Telangana and 5 others. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
33021 [ ! N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRl JUST]CE K. SARATH WRIT PE 320830F 2021 Between: S/o Mohd. Abid, Aged about 42yearc, Mql:rO YgX_e"l Ahmed, Occ. Business, R/o H. No. 1-8-50219, New Viquar Nagar, Prak--ash Nagar, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State_of Telangana, Rep by its The Special Chief Secretary to Govt, Revenue Department, BRK Bhavan, T. S. Secretariat, Hyderabid. 2. The€tateof Telang-ana, principal Rep by its The Secretary to Govt, MA and uu uepartment, T. S. Secretariat, Hyderabad ' 3. The District Collector, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy. 5. The Tahsildar, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District. 6. The Commissioner, Tellapur Municipality, Tellapur, Sangareddy District. ...
RESPONDENTS petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in circumstances the stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High a court '- pleased may be to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularry one nature of in the writ of Mandamus by decraring the action of the respondent his sub-ordinates No. 5 and in interfering and demorishing the compound wa, of the orrris PIot No' 623' Brock B, in sv. rvo. 13s part, ::ffiH,",lrJ;t situated at, agualapally Village, Ramachandrapuram SangareddyDistrictand rvranoar, tnt""tu''ng to dispossess the petitioner without issuing from his plot, any ,o,, a rbitra ry, vio rative ;'T :. yr"#T ", ;:::;,; ^-,;. 1 ffi; "ffi "Tffi consequently direct the respondent No. S and his sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his plot No. 623, admeasuring 400 square yards, Block B, in Sy. No.
135 part, situated at Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagulapally village, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice. 1 1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 5 and his sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 623, admeasuring 400 square yards, Block B, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated at Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagulapally Village, due process of Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, without following law and without issuing any notice. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl ESLAVATH RAJU AGP FOR No 1,3 To S: Counsel for the Respondents ! f! ]-S-'.!
neVANTHl REVENUE No 2 : GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent DPT AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT REDDY Sc FoR PUTTA'KRISHNA No 6 : SRI Counsel for the Respondent MUNICIPALITIES ORDER made the following: The Court E! 'l! / IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH IIIRIT PETITION No. 32O83 of 2O2l THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between: Mohd. Vakeel Ahmed .. Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by the special chief secretary to Government , Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & (5) others. ... Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, Iearned counsel for the pedtioner, Smt. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue and Sri pu tta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalitie. s, appearing for the respondents. perused the material on record.
l 2' Learned counser for the petitioner submits that the petitioner fiIed the present Writ petition seeking to declare action the of respondent No. S and their sub-ordinates in interfering with and demorishing the compound walr of the petitioner in \ \, respect of petitioner's Plot No. 623, Block B, in Sy. No. 135 Part, situated at Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagualapally Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District (for brevit5r, "the subject property") and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, as illegal and arbittary. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that' passed interim order dated this court while admitting the matter, 06. 12. 202ldtrectingtheofficialrespondentsnottointerferewith thepetitioner,spossessionoverthesubjectproperty,exceptin in by law. However, with the procedure established accordance spiteoflapseofmorethanfouryears,therespond.
entauthorities the averments for denying petition or vacate have not filed counter madebythepetitionerinthewritaffidavit. InviewoftheSarne, petition by writ this court to alrow the requested learned counser directingtherespondentauthorities4ottointerferewiththe ! possessionof. thepetitioneroverthesubjectpropertywithout of law' due Process following 4. ontheotherhand',learnedAssistantGovernrnentPleader of the possession is in the petitioner that if submits for Revenue subjectproperty'therespondentswillnotinterferewith-th]" it petitioner's possession over the subject property, without following due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders. 5. In view of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property, without following due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs. 6.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/. A. SRINIVASA RED AS STANT REG R ,TRUE COPYII CTION OFFICER T. o, 1. The The Special Chief Secretary to Govt, Revenue Department, State of \ Telangana, BRK Bhavan, T. S. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The The Principal Secretary to Govt. , MA and UD Department, State of Telangana, T. S. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector, Sangareddy District ai Sangareddy. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy. a 5. The Tahsildar, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District. 6. The Commissioner, Tellapur. Municipality, Tellapur, Sangareddy District. 7. One CC to SRI ESLAVATH RAJU, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIoN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DpT, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. tourl 10.
One CC to SRI SRI PUTTA KRTSHNA REDDY SC FOR MUNTCTPALTTTES, [OPUC] 1't. Two CD Copies DAN Er- Eiri. riii-: - HIGH COURT \ DATED:1711212025 STA ORDER 3 o7 JANI[? [ C ) I :r WP. No. 32083 ot 2021 * r--r,'. iii:; I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS laL h\t
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.