Mamilla Anand Kumar v. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-03. Mamilla Anand Kumar v. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
[ 3383 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION NO: 14803 OF 2015 Between: l\ilamilla Anand Kumar, S/o tvl-tMukund ji, Aged about 32 years, Occ Business, R:/o H. No. 2-3-645141N51 11, Prem Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Greater Hyderabad fVlunicipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Zonal Commissioner, GHtVlC, Circle No. 9, Abids, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant City Planner, GHIr/C, Circle No. 9, Abids, Hyderabad. 4 Nagilla Shyamala, W/o N. Yadagiri, Aged about 49 years, Fl/o H. No. 2-3-64714/39/1 , Prem Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action basing on the representations dt- 23-03-2015 and 24-04-2015 to stop or demolish the illegal and unauthorized construction made by the 4th respondent in the premises bearing No. 2-3-645l41A152, admeasuring 166. 6 Sq-yrds. , situated at Premnagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary and constitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 1 to 3 to take appropriate action in pursuant to the representations . dt- 23-03-2015 and 24-04- 2015. l. A. NO: 2 OF 201S(WPMP.
NO: 19254OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents to take appropriate action against the 4th respondent basing on the representations submitted by the petitioner s and 06-05-2015 pending dispo al of the above writ dt:23_03-2015,24-04-2015 petition. 2015 WPMP. NO: 19255 OF 2015 t. A. NO: 30F petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the r ircumstances stated filed in support of the petition, the High Corr t may be pleased to in the affidavit further constructic t respondent not to proceed pending finalization direct the 4th of the main writ Petition' l. A. NO: 1 oF2 015 WVMP. NO: 4830 OF 2015 Between: Naoilla Shvamala, W/o N. Yadagiri, Aged about 49 ) 3ars, Occ: Business ic. ,"rresoondent of Rishi Vidya Niketan High School at F remnagar, Amberpet, R:i o. H. No. 2-3-6471N3911, Prem Nagar, Anl Hyderabad. iiyOeraOaO) 'erpet, ..
PETITIONER AND Anand Kumar, S/o M. Mukund ji' Aged about 3:2 years, Occ Business' 1 tr. 4amilla 11, Prem Nagar, Amberpet, Hy3 :rabad. nlo H. tlo. Z-a-O45141N51 Rep. ry Commissioner, 2 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, its HYderabad. Tankbund Road, a No. 9, Abids, F Jerabad. The Zonal Commissioner, GHt\/C' Circle 1 lt No-9, Abids, I yderabad. 4 The Assistant City Planner, GHMC, Circle ... RESPONDENTS 151 CPC praying that in the r ircumstances stated Petitron under Section petition, filed in support of the the High Cott t may be pleased to in the affidavit )-1-5-2015 passed in dismiss the wflt petition by vacating the interim order date( WP no 1480312015. WP tVP no. 1925412015 in Ms' SOUMYA, REP' FOR Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATESWARLU SANISI: TTY No. 1 to 3: SRI G. MADHUSUD'AN REDDY, Counsel for the Respondent SC FOR GHMC No.
4: SRI VIVEK JAIN Counsel for the Respondent following: ORDER The Court made the IN THE HIGH COURT TOR THE STATE OF TELANGAITA AT ITYDERABAD THE IIONOTIRABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYAI{A ALISHETTY T PETITION No. 14aO3 of2015 DATED : O3. 12. 20. 25 Between: Mamilla Anand Kumar ... Petitioner AND t The Greater Hyderabad I Municipal Corporation and 3 others. ... Respondents ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms Soumya, learned counsel representing Mr. Venkateswarlu Sanisetty, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition Writ and made an endorsement to that effect on the Court bundle. 2 Permission, as sought for, is accorded. I / I re 3 Accordingly, I this Writ petition 1S dismissed I AS withdrawn- There sha-ll be no order as to costs Miscellaleous petitions pending, i1 aril shall stand closed.
There shall be no order as to costs fil 3,"^i,TH[BiHIA //TRUE COPY// i )'r' To, SECTION OFFICER 1 One CC ro SRt VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY, Advcr ate ) tOpUCl One CC to SRt VTVEK JA|N, Advocate tOpUCI one cc to sRt G. TVTADHUSUDHAN REDDY, sc FOR (j JMC lopuc] 4. Two CD Copies BSR BS K- HIGH COURT DATED:0311212025 - :\-i:, / j-. -\ e. '|, iil.. ORDER -) 09 :il:m WP. No. 14803 of 2015 ':, ,,,'. ,,9 \. l. ;r-. - _\-_ . -... DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS G. 4ftA W.
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.