Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Shaik Basheer Ahmed v. State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K. SARATH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-23. Shaik Basheer Ahmed v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[3302 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 12641 OF 2026 Between: Shaik Basheer Ahmed, S/o. Sk. Nagoor Saheb, Aged about 62 years, Retired Sub lnspector of Police, Chilakalaguda Traffic P. S. Hyderabad, Rl/o. H. No. 17, Srinivasa Colony, Saheb Nagar Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad- ... PETITIONER ANO 1. State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary to Govemment, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 500 022. 2. State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 3. The Commissioner of Police, Command and Control Centre, Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad City, 4. The Joint Director, Pension Payment Office, M. J. Road, Hyderabad. ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing the retirement benefits of the petitioner like Gratui$, Commutation, General Provident Fund and Encashment of Earned Leave etc.

, for the last nearly 6 months without any justification or reasonable cause even though the Accountant General, Telangana has already authorized the pension and other retirement benefits of the petitioner and that the 4th respondent has already generated Cheque (Token) Numbers and sent to Govemment for release of amounts is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, in-human, v ry cruel and violative of Articles 14, 16,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to release the retirement benefits of the petitioner i. e. General Provident Fund Amount vlde Token No. 2603656485 for Rs. 4,60,872l- and Token No. 2603466674 for Rs. 15,05,1581 towards Encashment of Earned Leave amount and Commutation amount vide Token No. 2602278197 for Rs. 18,40,3881 and Token No. 2602278212, for Rs. 1,87,9771- and Token Nos. 2602278175 for Rs. 14,51,7221- and 2602278187 for RsJ ,48,2781- towards Gratuity amount and Token No. 2601078362, dated 25-8-2025 for Rs.

520731 towards ASL encashment, and Promotion Arrears vide Token No. 260'1383846, dated 25-9-2025 for Rs. 1 7,1 B7l- and also amounts relating to PRC Arrears with Token Nos. , filed herewith as Annexure with interest per @10Y. annum from the date of retirement to the date of release of the amounts. l. A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to General Provident Fund Amount vide Token No. 2603656485 for Rs. 4,60,872l- and Token No. 2603466674 for Rs. 15,05,158/- towards Encashment of Earned Leave amount and Commutation amount vide Token No. 2602278197 for Rs. 18,40,388/- and Token No. 2602278212, for Rs. 1,87,9771- and Token Nos. 2602278175 for Rs. 14,51,7221- and 2602278187 for Rs. '1,48,278t towards Gratuity amount and Token No. 2601078362, dated 25-8-2025 for Rs. 52073/- towards ASL encashment, and Promotion Arrears vide Token No.

2601383846, dated 25-9-2025 for Rs. '17,187/- and also amounts relating to PRC Anears with Token Nos. , filed herewith as Annexure forthwith, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A TIRUPATHI GOUD Counsel for the Respondents: ASSISTANT GP FOR SERVICES lll The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 1264L of 2026 THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2026 Between: Shaik Basheer Ahmed. ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Finance and Planning Department and others. ... Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri A. Tirupathi Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-lII appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. With their consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself 2.

Learned counsel lor the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the instant Writ Petition questioning the action of the respondents in not releasing the petitioner,s retiral benefits, despite token numbers having already been raised by the respondent authorities lor payment of the amounts payable to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the lis raised in the present Writ petition has already been adjudicated lty the Division Bench of this Court in W. P. No. 23 138 of 2025, which was disposed, of uide order dated O3. O9. 2O25, and thus prayed to pass a similar order in the present Writ Petition also. 4. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Services-[r did not dispute the submissions made by learnecl counsel for the petitioner with regard to the disposal of W. p. No. 2313g of 2025 dated 03. o9.

2025 and submits that the respondents will release the amounts on a priority basis of the token numbers and prayed this Court to pass appropriate orders. 5 Having regard to the above made submissions and for the reasons alike in the order dated O3. O7. 2O2S passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W. P. No. 23138 of 2025, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire amount payable to the petitioner is released as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from today, failing which, the entire amount with regard to the retiral beneflts shall carry interest at the rate of loo/o pet annum, from the date the amount fell due, tilt the actual date of its payment. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ petition, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// 6 SECTION OFFICER To, 1.

The Principal Secretary to Government, , Finance and Planning Depa(ment, State of Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad S0O O22. 2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat' State of Telangana, ' Hyderabad 3. The Commissioner of Police, Command and Control Centre, Road No 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad CitY, 4. The Joint Director, Pension Payment Office, M J Road, Hyderabad' 5. One CC to Sri A, Tirupathi Goud' Advocate [OPUCI 6. Two CCs to GP for Services lll, Hrgh Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies TJ BS # . ? HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED: 2310412026 -. i:-li . :. ;n t\ + ORDER c F 'J tl5 14nr Zffi ic c WP. No. 12641 of 2026 . t. I * , \- o 7',. :itt -_:- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o\- \_// U(,

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.