P.N. SAXENA v. THE CHIEF SECRETARY
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2026-01-22. P.N. SAXENA v. THE CHIEF SECRETARY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT th ON THE 29 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 25466 of 2003 BETWEEN:- 1. P. N. SAXENA S/O LATE S. L. SAXENA, AGE 42 YEARS, ASSTT. GRADE-II, DEPARTMENT OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, BHOPAL. 2. MAHENDRA SONONE, S/O M. S. SONONE, AGE 38 YEARS, SECTION OFFICER, 3. RAJESH GUPTA, S/O SHRI R. D. GUPTA, AGED 36 YEARS, PERSONNEL SECRETARY. 4. S. K. TIWARI, S/O LATE G. P. TIWARI, AGED 45 YEARS, ASSTT. GRADE-II, 5. DHARAMCHAND PATEL S/O AMARCHAND PATEL, AGED 40 YEARS, ASSTT GRADE-II. 6. S. K. DWIVEDI S/O C. M. DWIVEDI, AGED 45 YEARS, ASSTT. GRADE-II. 7. AVON KMAR DHURVE S/O LATE B. S. DHURVE, AGED 22 YEARS, ASSISTANT GRADE-II. 8. JANAK SINGH S/O NANULAL AGED 36 YEARS, ASSISTANT GRADE-III. 9. NAMDEV DIGRASE, S/O SHRI RAJARAMNI DIGRASE, AGED 33 YEARS, ASSISTANT GRADE-III. 10. KU. CHHAYA LONARE D/O PRABHUDAS LONARE, AGED 31 YEARS, STENO TYPIST. 11. RAVINDRA MAHADIK S/O S. Y. MAHADIK, AGED 42 YEARS, ASSTT.
GRADE-I. 12. M. K. RAJONE S/O B. L. RAJONE, AGED 32 YEARS, ASSTT. GRADE-I. 13. HALKU SINGH PANDRO S/O H. L. PANDRO, AGED 29 YEARS, L. D. C. ALL EMPLOYEES BELONG TO OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, MADHYA PRADESH, BHOPAL, NEAR OLD VIDHAN SABHA BHAWAN, BHOPAL. Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUNIL KUMAR Signing time: 30-01-2024 15:56:05 ..... PETITIONERS (BY SHRI K. S. WADHWA - ADVOCATE) AND 1. CHIEF SECRETARY, STATE OF M. P. VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENT, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. B R I J RAJESWAR SHRAMA, SECTION OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, M. P. BHOPAL (FORMER MANAGER M. P. CHAIRMENSHIP VIKAS NIGAM) BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. KU. CHHAMA TIWARI, ASSISTANT GRADE-I, OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS M. P. BHOPAL AND FORMER ASSISTANT GRADE-I, EMPLOYEE OF M. P. LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT, BHOPAL A-4. (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI SUBODH KATHAR - GOVT.
ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT/STATE AND SHRI HEMANT SHRIVASTAVA - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO. 3) This petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER Counsel appearing for respondent No. 3 submitted that petitioner No. 1 has expired 10 years ago. Counsel for petitioners does not have any instruction. In these circumstances, petition be dismissed. Counsel appearing for petitioners prays for time to argue the case. It appears that counsel appearing for petitioners has lost touch with the parties due to long passage of time. SPC was also issued earlier, but same was also not served. In these circumstances, petition is dismissed. Counsel for petitioners will be at liberty to file application for restoration Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUNIL KUMAR Signing time: 30-01-2024 15:56:05 if any of the parties approach the counsel for litigating the matter before Court.
(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE sp/- Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUNIL KUMAR Signing time: 30-01-2024 15:56:05
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.