Chandrahas Yadav v. Mohd. Munna Ansari
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GOUTAM BHADURI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2020-07-11. Chandrahas Yadav v. Mohd. Munna Ansari. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT, BILASPUR E- LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Goutam Bhaduri Member - Lok Adalat : Shri Y. C. Sharma, Advocate MAC No. 948 of 2015 Chandrahas Yadav S/o Shri Ramchandra Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Jampali, P. S. And Tahsil - Pithora, Civil District- And District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant Versus 1. Mohd. Munna Ansari S/o Shri Hanif Ansari Aged About 38 Years R/o Saraipali, P. S. And Tahsil- Saraipali, Civil Distt. And Distt. - Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Truck No. C. G. 04/J/4532) 2. Ashok Agrawal, S/o Shri Sadarmal Agarwal Aged About 45 Years R/o Minocha Petrol Pump, Telibandha, Ravigram, Raipur, At Present R/o Saraipali, P. S. And Tahsil- Saraipali, Civil Distt. And Distt. - Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Owner Of Truck No. C. G. 04/J/4532) 3. National Insurance Company Ltd. , Office At Tatibandh Business Centre, Infront Of Bharat Mata Higher Secondary School-G. E.
Road, Tatibandh Raipur, Raipur And Civil District And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Ins. Com. Of Truck No. C. G. - 04/J/4532) ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant- Shri J. A. Lohani, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 & 2 – Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate. For respondent No. 3 - Shri B. N. Nande, Advocate. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER th (Passed on 11 July, 2020) The appellant is identified by Shri J. A. Lohani, Advocate. Shri B. N. Nande, counsel for insurance company and Shri P. S. Bindra, In-charge are present. Case is settled in the following terms. The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably settled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal, voluntarily.
We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal. There is no legal impediment to compromise and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed by the parties and order that insurance company shall pay Rs. 45,000/- (Rs. Forty five thousand only) by way of compensation in addition to the amount awarded by the Learned Tribunal to the appellant within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order, otherwise interest @ 9 % per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition, shall also be payable till its realization. Sd/- Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) (Y. C. Sharma) Judge -Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur gouri
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.