PREMSAGAR RANA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-02-17. PREMSAGAR RANA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:JHHC:4575] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 10507 of 2025 ------ Premsagar Rana, aged about 23 years, son of Shankar Mistri @ Shankar Rana, resident of Village Manjhimetriya, P. O. Birajpur, P. S. Khaga (earlier Palojori), District Deoghar, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P. P ------ Order No. 02 Dated- 17-02-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dumka (M) P. S. Case No. 56 of 2025 corresponding to G. R. Case No. 297 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 112 (2), 317 (2), 317 (4), 318 (2), 319 (2), 336 (2), 336 (3), 340 (2), of the B. N. S. , 2023 and Section 66B, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act.
This is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail as earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 04. 09. 2025 passed in B. A. No. 4891 of 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with his associates was involved in cybercrime and from his possession, two mobile phones, three SIM Cards, one laptop and cash of Rs. 3,000/- has been recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that though charge-sheet has been submitted in this case yet none of the alleged victim has been made witness in the charge-sheet, the copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-2 of this bail application. It is also submitted that all other co-accused persons, have already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01. 04. 2025 as is evident from para-07 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Spl Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka in connection with Dumka (M) P. S. Case No. 56 of 2025 corresponding to G. R. Case No. 297 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.
) Dated- 17. 02. 2026-Animesh/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.