Skip to main content
LawSphereX

SRI APPEGOWDA v. THE PRESIDENT

Court: High Court of Karnataka

Bench: R DEVDAS

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-21. SRI APPEGOWDA v. THE PRESIDENT. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

- 1 - WP No. 15064 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ST DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 15064 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: SRI. APPEGOWDA S/O THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O HUCHHANAPALYA, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRESIDENT Digitally signed LAND GRANT COMMITTEE by JUANITA BENGALURU NORTH TALUK THEJESWINI Location: HIGH K. G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVAN, K. G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KANDAYA BHAVAN, K. G. ROAD, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 009. - 2 - WP No. 15064 of 2025 4. THE PANCHAVATI TRUST (REGD) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, NO. 3412, 10TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 038. 5.

THE BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SHANTHINAGAR, K. H. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S. R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS W. P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLS 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 14. 05. 2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE KARNATAKA APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU IN MATTER BEARING RP NO 107/2015. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 09. 04. 2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. - 3 - WP No. 15064 of 2025 If office objections are not complied with, re-list this matter on 17. 04. 2026 for "Dismissal". 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4.

Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No. : 2 Sl No. : 8

Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.