A. Sunitha v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited and 4 Others
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: A.ABHISHEK REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-11. A. Sunitha v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited and 4 Others....
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 22697 OF 2020 Between: A. Sunitha, W/o. Sri A. Mallesh Yadav, aged about 45 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. H. No. 1-88, MadhapurVillage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudh-a, Somajiguda, Hyderabad Rep. by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director 2 The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 3 The Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Kukatplly, Hyderabad. 4 The Asst. Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Ayyappa Society, l\,4adhapur, Hyderabad.
5 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad Circle, Tank Bund, Rep. by its Commissioner. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that ln the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, older or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not receiving the application form and not releasing the power supply to the petitioner House Bearing H. No. n 2-56111111/32, admeasuring 400 sq yards in Sy. No. '1 1/32, Situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to release the power supply without being influenced by the instructions of the 5th respondent.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to receive the application form and release the power supply to the petitioner House Bearrng H. No. 2-5611 1111132, admeasuring 400 sq yards in Sy. No,11l32, Situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Ir. 4andel, Range Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HARI KISHAN KUDIKALA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRI R. VINOD REDDY, STANDING COUNSEL FOR TSSPDCL. Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDy, STANDING COUNSEL FOR GHMC. The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22697 of 2O2O ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petirioner, Sri R.
Vinod Reddy, learned Standir-rg counsel for Telangana State Southern Pot'er Distribution Companl' Limited, appearing lor respondent Nos. I lo 4, and learned Standing cournsel for Creater Hvderabad Municipal Corporation appearing lor respondent No. 5, With their consenl, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission it sclf. When the matter is taken up lor hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the lis in the present rvrit petition is squarely covered by the orders passed this Court in W. P. No. 22849 of 2018, dated 05. 07. 2018, W. P. 21i0O of 2019, dated25. O9. 2019, and W. P. No. 7997 of 2O2O, dated ll. 06. 2O2O. The above said submission is not disputed by the learned Standing Counsels appearing lor the respondents herein.
ln vicw of the same and for the reasons alike in the orders referred to above, the present Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to releasc rndividual service connection to the petitioner s,ithin a period of lour u'eeks from the datc oI receipt oi a copy of this order, subject to the petitioner fulfilling the other formalities and conditions stipulated by TSSPDCL. Thc service connection so given shall be subject to further directions that may be issued by lhe State of Telangana or the Apex Court in the Iitigation pending before it arising out of the order, dated 12. O9. 2012, in W. P. No. 20407 ot 2OO8 & batch. The miscetlaneous petitions pending, ii any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs SD/. CH. VENKATESWARULU ASSISTANT REG //TRUE COPY// SECTI N OFFICER To, 1. The Chairman-cum-Manaqinq Director, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Li-mit-ed, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad 2.
The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 3. The Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Kukatplly, Hyderabad. 4. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Ayyappa Society, Madhapur, Hyderabad. 5. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad Circle, Tank Bund. 6. One CC to Sri. Hari Kishan Kudikala, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One C. C. to Sri. R. Vinod Reddy, Standing Counsel for TSSpDCL. (OPUC) A C C. to Sri. Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, Standing 9ttq. Counsel for GHMC. (oPUC) (along with a copy of Order dated: O5lO7l2O18 in Wp. No. 22849 ol 2O1g) 9. Two CD Copies Prk HIGH COURT DATED:11t12t202o ORDER WP. No. 22697 of 2020 G 1 tl s TA 14: o 16 DEC 2020 ,. (\ t * n t*. Disposing of the WP. at the stage of admission without costs.
w I RAO THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M'S'RAMACHANDRA I 849 o f 2018 W. P. N o. 22 OR DER: the petitioners, the Government Heard cournsel for Sri R'Vinod for 1'1 respondent' Pleacler lor Energv appearing to 5' for respondents 2 Reddl', Standing Counsel appearing Hyderabad Municipal Corporation 2. The Greater represented by its Commissioner is suo motu impleaded as a party respondent in the Writ Petition' 3. It is stated by counsel on either side that the issue in this Writ Petition is covered by the order passed by this Court in W. P. No. 32674 of 2015 dt. 18. 12. 2015. 4.
Therefore, for reasons alike, this Writ Petition is also disposed of directing the respondents to release neri' service connections to the petitioners on paYment of requislte charges by the petitioners u'ithin a period of four (04) u'eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, which shall be subject to the further directions which may be issued by the State Government of Telangana or the Supreme Court, which is considering the judgment dt. l2. O9. 2Ol2 of Division Bench of this Court in W. P. No. 204O7 of 2OO8 and batch. No order as to costs. 5. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if anv, shall stand dismissed M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J 05th July, 2018. gra
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.