Smt. G.Uma Devi, v. State of Telangana,

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI

Judgment date: 2025-12-02

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-02. Smt. G.Uma Devi, v. State of Telangana,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI wRIT PETITION NO: 3942 OF 2017 Between: years, 1. Smt. G. Uma Devi, W/o Late Gurunatha Rao, aged about 75 Prashasan Nagar, Road No. 72, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 2. G. Ashwarth, S/o Late Gurunatha Rao, aged about 47 years, Prashasan Nagar, Road No. 72, Jubilee Hills' Hyderabad. 3. Smt. G. Vasantha,, Wo K. Suresh Kumar, aged about 53 years, residing at Kingdom of Beharin. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department' Secretariat Buildings, at Hyderabad. 2 The Protection Officer, O/o Proiect Director, District Women and Child Development Department, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. . | Smt. Lakshmi Rao, W/o H. N. S. Rao, Rl/o Flat No. 101 Excel Ashwini ' Apartmenls, Plot No. 48, Journalists Colony, Road No.

70' Jubilee Hills, Neknampur' Hvderabad. Office at Plot No. 6-2-477, Secretariat Rijendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. ..... RESPONOENTS praying Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia the High Court circumstances sta in the affidavit filed therewith, particularly one in pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more the of prohibition, prohibiting the Court of the XXlll Metropolitan writ Rajen ranagar, Ranga Reddy District from proceeding Upparpalli, D. V. C. No. 27 of 20 6, declaring it as abuse of process of law. l. A. NO: 1 oF 2017(VWMP. NO: 767 0F 20171 Between: Excel Ashwinr Plot Smt. Lakshmi Rao, W/o H. N. S Rao, R/o Flat No. 101 , Apartments, Plot ir^ i[. r",,. natists Colonv. Road No. 70, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, Office at q77 ii ai . Secretariat Hills, Neknampur, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District' ..... PETlTlONER/RESPONDENT No. 3 AND rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, 1. State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, at Hyderabad.

District Women and Child 2. The Protection Officer, O/o Project Director, al Hyderabad. Development Department, Ranga Reddy District ..... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Gurunatha Rao, 75 years, R/o 3. Smt. G. Uma Devi, W/o Late aged about 120, Prashasan Nagar, Road No. 72, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. '120, about 47 years, Fyo 4. G. Ashwarth, S/o Late Gurunatha Rao, aged Hyderabad Prashasan Nagar, Road No. 72, Jubilee Hills' K. Suresh Kumar, aged about 53 years, presently 5. Smt. G. Vasantha,, W/o residing at Kingdom of Beharin. ..... RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS '1 in the circumstances stated Petition Under Section 51 CPC praying that in petition, the High Coult may be pleased to the affidavit filed in support of the of WP'No vacate the order dt. 06. 02. 2017 passed in WPMP. No. 47Ol 2017 in justice. 3942 of 2017 in the interest of F 20171 t. A. NO:4 OF 2017(WPMP.

NO: 4707 O Petition Under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay alt further proceedings in D. v c. No. 27 of 2016 on the file of the court of the XXll lVletropolitan Magistrate, Upparpalli, Hyderabad, including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of the writ petilion. l. A. NO :1 oF , Between --1. -srt. G. Uma Devi, w/o Late Gurunatha Rao, aged about 75 years, R/o 120, No 72, Jubilee Hills' Hyderabad l Prashasan Nagar, Road about 47 years, Fl/o 120, Slo t_aie Gurunatha Rao, aged 2. G. Ashwarth, - No 72, Jubilee Hills' Hyderabad' Prutnu"un Nagar, Road 53 years' presently W/o K. Suresh Kumar, aged about 3. b;i c. Vr. "nlr,r,, Beharin residing at Kingdom of ..... PETITIONERS AND '"'i. Secretary' Home Department' Strt" of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretariat Buildings, at Hyderabad' protection District Women and Child Officer' O/o Project Director' z.

ine -' Development Department, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad' Flat No 101 Excel Ashwini Rao, W/o H. N S Rao, FJo S. S. t. t-ixtn*i ' -' No'70' Plot No. 48, Journalists Colony' Road Jubilee Hills' nfr. t. "nt. , HiJeranaa, Office at Plot No 6-2-477, Secretariat Hills' Neknampur' Ranga Reddy District Rajendranagar, ..... RESPONDENTS PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin b^e^ pleased to support of the petition, the High Court may tre anioavtt filed in O2'2O17 in W P No' 3942 of 2017 on 06 ' tn" i. "rim orders passed "r. rj" : SRI V'SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Petitioners I I Counsel forthe Respondent No'1 : SRI D'PRADEEP' AGP FOR HOME ? Gounsel for the Respondent No'2 : GP FOR WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND I t CHILD WELFARE i , t Counsel for the Respondent No'3 : SRI PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL The Court made the following ORDER T ! I I II{ TI"{E HIGH COURT FOR TFiE STATE OF TET. ANGANA AT HYDERABAD TTIE HONOIJRABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.

3942 OF 2017 DATE:02. 12. 2025 Bet,. l,eor:: Sr n I',,rr,a De"i 8 C'thers . . . Petitioner AND ftre- Stat: ,)f Telangana & Others . .. Respcnderrts oflilliR Thrs \(irit Petrt on is filed seeking to prchibit the Ccir;-i or the X)(iil irr'it:tropolitan liagistrate, tJpparpalli. Rajeridranaoi:r. Rai'rg:r Rr:oiiy District frorri proceeding with in D. V. C. No. 27 c>f 2A16, dcc:r;iril :i as abuse cf prccess of latv ,l I'i. l€ :rnp? ais 'rr the pelitioners 3 Hea. d I\,4r D P-adeep, learneci Assrstant Goverrrrnent Piearier' fr:l l I ii: ne 4 ahe learneci Assistant Government Pleader for Horne subnrits tii. i't as the petitione i's irave not been prosecuting the,Tatter and J have renraineC unrepresented despite repeated listings, th'-rs the relief sought in the writ petition apparently, become infructuo,;s 5. The record discloses that when the inatter was listed on 04. 11. 2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petirioners, whereupon the case was directed to be posted on 18. -t 1.

2025. Cn 18. i1. 2025, again, as there v,/a s no representation for the petitioners, the matier v;as directed io be listeo today under- tlte caption "for disnrissal. " Even today, there is nc appearattce or repre':entation on benalf of the petitioners 6. ln these circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the cause in the writ petition has beconre infruchLous and that the petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prose ci. rtion 7 . Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution There shail be no ordei as to costs iVliscellaneous petitions, penciing if any, snall stand closed SD/. K. BHAVANI SWAMY AS ISTANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To AN CHILD WELFARE, 1. Two CC's to GP FOR WOMEN na. Hig h Court for the State of Tela IOUTI Court for the of Telangana at 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, H Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI V. S URYA KIRAN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] , Advocale [OPUCI 4. One CC tO SRI PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL 5.

Two CD Copies SA TJ Bt1 HIGH COURT DATED:0211212025 eertGs-iEE;,,, /. -- -.. ) . ) i\ 1i u nR 2ll28 2 . -) I :g * * ) ORDER WP. No. 3942 ot 2017 DISMISSING THE W. P _ FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS. r-L \ 1l . ,b IA

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.