Skip to main content
LawSphereX

ALOK RANJAN MISHRA v. STATE OF ODISHA

Court: High Court of Orissa

Bench: MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2024-12-20. ALOK RANJAN MISHRA v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W. P. (C) No. 31935 of 2024 Alok Ranjan Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. S. P. Swain, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. P. P. Behera, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH ORDER Order No. 20. 12. 2024 01. 1. By means of this writ petition, the Petitioner seeks the following relief :- “Allow this Writ Petition, and issue Rule Nisi, asking the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why they shall not promote the petitioner to the post of VLW from the post of Gram Panchayat Secretary and if the Opp. Parties do not show cause or show insufficient cause, then issue a writ of mandamus in nature, thereby directing the concerned Opp. Parties to promote the petitioner to the post of VLW from the post of Gram Panchayat Secretary within a stipulated period. ” 2.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that in connection with the redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has moved before the Opposite Party No. 2, i. e. Collector, Balangir by filing a representation dated 14. 08. 2024 under Annexure – 5, which has not yet been responded. 3. Keeping in view the above submission, it is directed that, in the event any such representation has been filed by the Petitioner before Opp. Party No. 2 and the same is pending till date, Opposite Party No. 2 shall do well in disposing the same within a period of two // 2 // months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order keeping in view the letters under Annexure-4 series to the writ petition and shall communicate the result thereof to the Petitioner within two weeks thereafter.

In case the documents referred to in Annexure-4 is found not annexed to the representation, the Petitioner may furnish the same along with the certified copy of this order for appreciation of the authority. It is made clear that this Court has not passed any opinion on merit of the case. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge S. K. Parida Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SAMIR KUMAR PARIDA Designation: ADR-cum-ADDL. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Reason: Authentic Copy Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 20-Dec-2024 16:50:14

Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.