Skip to main content
LawSphereX

SUDAMA DEVI ALIAS SUDAMA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-05. SUDAMA DEVI ALIAS SUDAMA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (Cr. ) No. 689 of 2023 Sudama Devi @ Sudama Kumari, Wife of Sikandar Barnwal, aged about- 35 years, Resident of Patel Nagar, Near Gandhi School, Jhumri Telaiya, P. O. - Jhumri telaiya, PS-Telaiya, District- Koderma. ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma, P. O. , P. S. and District- Koderma. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Koderma, P. O. , P. S. and District- Koderma. 4. The S. D. O. , Koderma, P. O. , P. S and District- Koderma. 5. Binod Yadav, father’s name not known to petitioner, Officer-in-charge, Telaiya Police Station. P. O. - Jhumri Telaiya, P. S- Telaiya, District- Koderma. 6 Ramsewak Modi, Son of late Khedan Modi. 7. Kalawati Devi, Wife of Ramsewak Modi. 8. Nandan Modi, Son of Ramsewak Modi, 9. Munna Modi, Son of Dashrath Modi, 10. Vinti Devi, Wife of Munna Modi. 11. Fulwa Devi, Wife of Dashrath Modi, 12.

Mohit Modi, Son of Dashrath Modi, Respondents 7 to 13 are resident of Near Gandhi School, Jhumri Telaiya, P. O- Jhumri Telaiya, P. S. - Telaiya, District- Koderma. ..... … Respondents -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ravi Kerketta, A. C. to S. C. -VI. For the Private Resps. : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate. ------ 05/ 05. 12. 2024 After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with the liberty to move before the appropriate court for redressal of the grievances of the petitioner made in the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the private respondents have got no objection. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) Amitesh/- -1-

Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.