M/s.Vijendra Info Soft Private Limited v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: RENUKA YARA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-16. M/s.Vijendra Info Soft Private Limited v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
134421 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PETITION NO: 6261 OF 2026 Between: M/s. Vijendra lnfo Soft Private Limited, Rep by its Director Sri M. Santosh Kumar S/o. M. Ramulu, aged 39 years, Occ Director F/o. H. No. 8-1-47, Teachers Colony Mahabubnagar (V and M), Mahabubnagar District. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Labour and Em ployment Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector/Chairman, District Level Outsourcing Committee Medchal Malkajgiri District. 3. The District Convener, District Employment Officer District Level Outsourcing Committee Medchal Malkajgiri District. 4. The Joint Director, (Medicat) tnsurance Medical Services Nacharam, . Hyderabad. 5. M/s. SRR Enterprises, Rep. by its Partner/Director Sri M. Santosh, Aged Major R/o. H. No.
2-9511, Sadashiva Nagar Sangareddy (V and M), Sangareddy District' ... RESP. NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned proceedings of the 2nd Respondent vide Proceedings No. A/Outsourcing/JD(lMS')12026-27, dated 24. 02. 2026, whereby the allotment of outsourcing agency in favour of the Petitioner was cancelled unilaterally without notice and the same was allotted to the Sth Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of the principles of natural justice and consequently, Setasidetheimpugnedproceedingsofthe2ndRespondentvideProceedingsNo. A,/Outsourcinga/JD(lMsy2o26-27 , dated 24. 02.
2026, and direct Respondent Nos' to 4 to perrrit the Petitioner agency to perform the contract work for the financial year 2026-2TintermsofallotmentproceedingsvideProceedingsNo. A,/Outsourcing/JD(l MSy2026-27, dated 1 6. 02. 2026' t. A" NO:1 0F 2026 PetiticlnunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the lmpugned Proceedings of the 2nd respondent vide Proceedings No' of the above daled 24. 02. 2026, pending disposal A,/Outsourcing/Jot(lwsy2o26-27, writ petition. I. A. NO:,2CtF 2O26 praying that the circumstances stated in the Petition under Section 151 cPC in the court may be pleased to direct affidavit filerl in support of the petition, High perform the contract work Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to permit the Petitioner agency to for the financial year 2o26-27 in terms of allotment proceedings vide Proceedings No. A,/Outsourcing/JD/(lMS/20 26-27, daled 16. 02.
2026, pending disposal of the above writ p'3tition. l. A NO: 3 OF 2026 Betureen: 1. The l;tate of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Labour and Employment Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The l)istrict collector/chairman, District Level outsourcing commiftee Medchal Malkajgiri District. 3. The District convener, District Employment officer District Level outsourcing Committee Medchal Malkajgiri District. ... PETIT]ONERS AND 1. M/s. Viiendra Info Soft Private Limited, Rep by ils Director Sri M'Santosh Kumai S/o. M. Ramulu, aged 39 years, Occ Director Fl/o. H'No'8-1-47' Teacht;rs Colony Mahabubnagar (V and M), Mahabubnagar District' 2. The Joint Director, (Medical) lnsurance Medical Services Nacharam, Hyderabad. 3. M/s. SRR Enterprises, Rep. by its Partner/Director Sri M. Santosh, Aged Major Rl/o. H. No. 2-95/1, Sadashiva Nagar Sangareddy (V and M), Sangareddy District. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim Order dated 26. 02. 2026 passed in lA No. 11. 2O26 in WP No. 6261/2026, pending disposal of the writ petition. l. A. NO: 4 OF 2026 Between: M/s. SRR Enterprises, Rep. by its Partner/Director Sri M. Santosh, Aged Major R/o. H. No. 2-95l1, Sadashiva Nagar Sangareddy (V and M), Sangareddy District. ... PETITIONER AND 1. M/s. Vijendra lnfo Soft Private Limited, Rep by its Director Sri M. Santosh Kumar S/o. M. Ramulu, aged 39 years, Occ Director R/o. H. No. 8-1-47, Teachers Colony Mahabubnagar (V and M), Mahabubnagar District. 2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Labour and Employment Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector/Chairman, District Level Outsourcing Comrnittee Medchal Malkajgiri District. 4.
The District Convener, District Employment Officer District Level Outsourcing Committee Medchal Malkajgiri District. 5. The Joint Director, (Medicat) lnsurance Medical Services Nacharam, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble High Court in WP. No. 626i of 2026 dated 26-02-2026, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. RA. IA SRIPATHI RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI NIMMARABOINA NAVEEN Counsel fbr the Respondent No. 1 to 3: SRI T. VENKAT RA. rU GOUD, GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRI P. SHRAVAN KUMAR GOUD, GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMILYWELFARE Counsel f,cr the Respondent No. 5: SRI JALLI KANAKAIAH, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. Ms. N. V. R. RA.
IYA LAKSHttll The Court made the folloaring: ORDER a\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAI\GANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA l6'n DAY oF APRrL,2o26 Between: IvI/s. Vijendra Info Soft Private Limited. Petitioner AND The State of Telangana and 4 others' ... Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri P. Raja Sripathi Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing counsel for the petitioner; Sri T' Sri Nimmaraboina Naveen, learned for Labour for respondent venkat Raju Goud, learned Government Pleader for leamed Govemment Pleader Nos. l to 3; Sri P. Shravan Kumar Goud, and Sri Welfare, for respondent No'4 Jalli Medical Health and Family Ms' N'V'R' Rajya Counsel representing Kanakaiah, learned Senior for respondent No'5' Perused the entire record' Lakshmi, learned counsel 2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: ..... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction: mole particularly one in the natuie oi W.
it of Mandamus, declaring the impugned proceedings of the znd Respondent vide Proceedings the 26-27, dated 24. 02. 2026' whereby No. A/Outsourcing/JD(tMsy20 in favour of the Petitioner was allotment of outsourcing agency noii.. and the same was allotted to the cancelled unilaterally withoui and violative of ," iil-["rrorrJ"n,, as iilegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional /-justice and consequently set aside the tt. plii,"ipfl, of natural :: ti it I RY, J wp_6261_2026 imptrgned proceedings of the 2nd Respondent vide proceedings No. lrlOutsourcing/JD(IMsy2026-27. dated 24. 02. 2026, and direct Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to permit the Petitioner agency to perform the contract work for the financial year 2026-27 in tcrms of allotment proct:edings vide Proceedings No. A/oursourcing/JD(tMs) 12026-27 . dated 16. 02. 2026, and to pass such other order or orders... " 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 2 passed the impugned proceedings dated 24. 02.
2026 without issuing notice to the writ petitioner in violation of principles of natural justice as the said n:spondent No. 2 also issued proceedings dated 16. 02. 2026 for continuatic,n of services of the writ petitioner for ESI Dispensaries (Outsourcing and activity basis) in Medchal-Matkajgiri District for the financial year 2026-2027 . Having issued said proceedings on 16. 02. 2026, without notice to the writ petitioner vide proceedings dated 24. 02. 2026 i. e. , within 8 days respondent No. 2 discontinued the services of the writ petitioner b;r allotting the same to respondent No. 5. 4. Learned Government Pleader for respondent Nos. l to 3 relied upon the G. o. Rt. No. 427l, dated 01. 11. 2008 and G. o. Rt. No. 4459, dated 27. 12. 2006 contending that the District Collector/respondent No. 2 has powers to de:termine continuation and termination of Outsourcing Agency without any reason at any point of time. w_6261_2026 5. Learned Government Pleader for respondent No.
4 furnished of letters addressed by respondent No. 4 to respondent No. 2 satisfaction with the services provided by writ petitioner, recommendation to continue the said services. 6. Learned Senior Counsel for respondent No. 5 submits that agreement between the writ petitioner and respondent No. 2, the are to be continued only up to 31. 03. 2026, but on account termination of the said services by respondent No. 2, W. P. No -26932 2025 hasbeen filed and the said petition was disposed with a direction continue the writ petitioner as per the agreement i. e. , upto'31. 03-2026- According to the learned counsel for respondent No. 5, the proceedings dated 16. 02. 2026 are meant to comply with the orders passed Coordinate Bench of this Court in W. P. No. 26932 of 2025. However, contents of the said proceedings dated 16. 02. 2026 have an anomaly continuation of services of the writ petitioner for the financial year instead of continuation upto 3 1. 03. 2026.
In view of the said anomaly, not possible to conclude that the proceedings dated 16. 02. 2026 were for the purpose of compliance with the orders passed by Coordinate of this Court in W:P. No. 26932 of 2025. RY, J wp_6261 2026 7 - As per respective contentions, there is dispute between the writ petitioner and respondent No. 5 as to who was allotted to provide services for ESI Dispensaries for the financial year 2026-27. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that without notice the impugned proceedings dated 24-02-202(i have been issued, without referring to the proceedings dated 16. 02. 2026. 8. AfteI arguing at length, there was consensus among the respective learned counsel for the parties to set aside the impugned proceedings dated 24-02-2026 with a direction to respondent No.
2 to issue fresh notification and select the outsourcing Agency for providing services to the ESI Dispensarier; for the financial year 2026-27 by following due process of law within t'wo weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and till such time thr: services of the writ petitioner may be continued. 9. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/. B. REKHA RANI REGISTRAR /,TRUE SECTION OFFICER To, \ 1. The Principal Secretary Labour and Department Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. 2. The District Collector/Chairman, District Level Outsourcing Committee Medclral Malkajgiri District. 3. The District Convener, District Employment Officer District Level Outsourcing Comnrittee Medchal Malkajgiri District. 4. The ,Joint Director, (Medical) lnsurance Medical Services Nacharam, Hydenrbad. / 5. The Partner/Director sri M. santosh, M/s.
SRR Enterprises, R/o. H. No. 2-gsl1, Sadashiva Nagar sangareddy (V and M), Sangareddy District. 6. One CC to SRI NIMMARABOTNA NAVEEN, Advocate tOpUCI 7. One CC to Ms. N. V. R. RAJYA LAKSHM! , Advocate [OpUC] 8. Two ccs to GP FoR MEDTCAL HEALTH & FAMtLy WELFARE, High court \ for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad TOUTJ 9. Two ccs to GP FoR LABOUR, High court for the state of relangana at Hyderabad [OUTI 10. Two CD Copies BSR/PMK CG TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 1610412 I I I :i:-- I STAT c / U't \ ,t I o ,rttf I I o , * ORDER WP. No. 6261 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS il,
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.