PINTU KUMAR RAKSHIT @ PINTU RAKSHIT v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-05-01. PINTU KUMAR RAKSHIT @ PINTU RAKSHIT v. STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2026:JHHC:12908 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3056 of 2026 ---- Pintu Kumar Rakshit @ Pintu Rakshit, aged about 31 years, Son of Late Sadhan Rakshit, Resident of Village-Badodih, P. O. Rajnagar, P. S. Rajnagar, District Seraikella-Kharsawan …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A. P. P ----st 03/Dated: 01 May, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant, who is in custody since 20. 07. 2025, has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S. T Case No. 222 of 2025, arising out of Rajnagar P. S. Case No. 57 of 2025, for the offence 309(5) of the B. N.
S, 2023 and Sections 25 (1-B) a/26(1)/35 of the Arms Act and charge has been framed under Sections 309(5), 303(2), 317(5), 312, 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) of the B. N. S and Section 25(1-B) (a)/26(1)/25(6) & 35 of the Arms Act, pending in the court st of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-1 at Seraikella. 3. The prayer for bail of the applicant was earlier dismissed as withdrawn by this Court, vide order dated 09. 03. 2026 passed in B. A No. 1078 of 2026. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the charge has already been framed on 03. 02. 2026.
It has also been submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The applicant is a labour. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on 2026:JHHC:12947 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and st Additional Sessions Judge-1 at Seraikella in connection with S. T Case No. 222 of 2025, arising out of Rajnagar P. S. Case No.
57 of 2025, on the condition that the applicant will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before the learned Trial Court which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. (Rajesh Kumar, J. ) st Dated 01 May, 2026 Raja/Uploaded Page | 2 B. A. No. 3056 of 2026
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.