DR BASAPPA S/O SHIDDALINGAPPA, TELI v. KAMALAWWA W/O HONNAPPA SATTIGERI
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-07-31. DR BASAPPA S/O SHIDDALINGAPPA, TELI v. KAMALAWWA W/O HONNAPPA SATTIGERI. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
- 1 - RFA No. 100182 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH ST DATED THIS THE 31 DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100182 OF 2015 (PAR) BETWEEN: DR. BASAPPA S/O SHIDDALINGAPPA TELI, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL PRACTIONER AND AGRICULTURE, R/O: ALAGAWADI, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ABHISHEK PATIL AND SRI. M. R. SHINDE. , ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. KAMALAWWA W/O HONNAPPA SATTIGERI, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEMAKER, R/O: KESARAGOPPA, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALAKOT. 2. SMT. PARAWWA W/O DUNDAPPA GOKAK, Digitally signed by AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEMAKER, PREMCHANDRA M R R/O: SULTHANAPUR, TQ: RAIBAG, Location: HIGH COURT OF DIST: BELAGAVI. KARNATAKA 3. SMT. BOURAWWA W/O SHIRISHAL BAGI, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEMAKER, R/O: HALINGALI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALAKOT. 4. SMT. MAHADEVI W/O ALLAPPA GANIGER, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEMAKER, R/O: GURLAPUR, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. 5. SHRI.
RAMESH S/O SHIDDALINGAPPA TELI, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, - 2 - RFA No. 100182 of 2015 R/O: ALAGAWADI, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI. 6. DR. SHRISHAIL S/O SHIDDALINGAPPA TELI, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL PRACTIONER AND AGRICULTURE, R/O: TELI ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER AND MATERNITY HOME, NEAR A. G. DESAI CIRCLE, (MURGOD PLOT), JAMAKHANDI, TQ: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALAKOT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. J. S. SHETTY. , ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; R4-HELD SUFFICIENT; R5-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; SRI. SHRIKANTH. D. BABALADI. , ADVOCATE FOR R6; SRI. CHETAN NAIK AND SRI. N. M. PATIL. , ADVOCATES FOR R6) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. Sri. J. S. Shetty. , learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3 has appeared in person.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2015. Now we are in the month of July - 3 - RFA No. 100182 of 2015 2024. The appeal is pending for almost nine years. As already noted above, there is no representation on behalf of appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No. : 3 Sl No. : 20
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.