JOYNAL ABDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-09-22. JOYNAL ABDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010122152020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln. 1846/2020 1:JOYNAL ABDIN S/O OMAR ALI, R/O LOTORIA, N. C. VILLAGE, P. S BOKO, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS 1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A PARAMANIK Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 22-09-2020 Heard Mr. A. Paramanik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P. P. , Assam, appearing for the respondent State. The petitioner, namely, Joynal Abdin has prayed for an order under Section 439 Cr. P. C. praying for bail in the matter of Boko P. S. Case No. 934/2018 correspondent to Special Session (NDPS) Case No. 06/2019 under Sections 20(a),(b),(c) NDPS Act,1985. The petitioner was found growing cannabis plants in his residential compound.
Police had to cut down 55 numbers of cannabis plants growing on the land of the petitioner. The accused petitioner was charge-sheeted and trial has been going on before the Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingaon. Some of the witnesses have supported the allegations against the petitioner. Page No. # 2/2 The bail application of the petitioner was rejected by the trial Court. I do not find any reason to interfere into the matter. Any interference by the High Court might cause delay in disposal of the trial of the case. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is rejected. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.