Teesta Petrotech Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India and 8 Ors.
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2024-11-06. Teesta Petrotech Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India and 8 Ors. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No. 634 of 2024 Teesta Petrotech Pvt. LTD. ………Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. …….. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D J Saha, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Majumder, Dy. SGI. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD ORDER 06. 11. 2024 Heard Mr. D. J Saha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Majumder, learned Dy. SGI, appearing for the respondent-Union of India. [2] This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- “i. Issue Rule NISI. ii. Issue a rule calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of Mandamus shall not be issued mandating/directing/commanding the respondents No. 1, 2 and 5 to cancel the license granted to the respondent No. 6,7 ,8 and iii. Issue a rule calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of mandamus mandating/directing/commanding the respondents No.
1, 2 and 5 to suspend/ cancel the license or import permission granted to EMER-ITALY, OMBL-ITALY and LANDIRENZO-ITALY by the respondent No. 2. iv. Issue a rule calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of mandamus mandating/directing/commanding the respondents No. 1, 2 and 5 to suspend/cancel the license granted in favour of respondent No. 6,7 ,8 and 9, immediately and till the decision of this Hon’ble High Court. v. Issue a rule calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of mandamus mandating/directing/commanding the respondents No. 1,2 and 5 to take appropriate measures in accordance to the Acts and Rules, to ensure the safety of the general public. [3] Heard and perused the evidence on record. [4] After perusal of the record, it has been seen that a rd communication letter dated 03 June,2024 has been issued by the Dy.
Chief Controller of Explosives for Chief Controller of Explosives, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Petroleum and Explosives Safety th Organization(Formerly-Department of Explosives)”A” Block,5 Floor, CGO Complex, Seminary Hills, Nagpur-440006, addressed to M/s FJM Cylinder Pvt. Ltd, Plot No. 360-61, Sector-3 IMT- Bawal- 123501, Rewari, (Haryana) based on a complaint No. 777/TPPL/787(PESO)- 101/177 dated 16. 03. 2024 received from Shri Tapan Sarkar, Managing Director, Teesta Petrotech Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner herein). [5] In view of such circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the concerned-respondents to decide the case of the petitioner rd in light of the communication letter dated 03 June,2024 in accordance with law and the decision taken in this regard be communicated to the petitioner within a period of 02(two) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
[6] With the above observation and direction, this present writ petition stands disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed. JUDGE Paritosh
Source: High Court of Tripura. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.