V. GIRIDHAR RAO v. The Chief Executive Officer
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: PULLA KARTHIK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-10-30. V. GIRIDHAR RAO v. The Chief Executive Officer. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3301 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 3278 OF 2017 Between: V. GIRIDHAR RAO, Bhagwantha Rao, Aged about 43 years, Senior Assistant, Mandai Praja Parishad, Bheemini, Adilabad District (under orders of Suspension). R/o. Bheemini ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chief Executive Officer, Z. P. P, Adilabad, Adilabad District. 504001 2 The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Employment, State of Telangana, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. 500 029. 3 State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-22 ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the impugned Proc. No. P2l1B3l2O14, dated 30-5-2014 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently hold that the applicant is entitled for reinstatement to duty as Senior Assistant with all consequential benefits Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MUKHARAM KHAN, COUNSEL REPRESENTING FOR SRI D BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : SC FOR ZP&MP Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : GP FOR SERVICES - ll The Court made the following: ORDER REGISTRAR THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA Ii: TRTHIK WRIT PETITION TRI No. 3278 of 2( L'7 ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearLr g, Sri Mukharam Khan, learned counsel, representing Sri D.
Bala K I han Rao, counsel for the petitioner, submits that due to efflux r;f time, the the present writ petition (TR) does not survive for arljr o. ication, and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above made submissions, petition the V/ it dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications, if ar-ry, pending in th : writ petition shall stald closed. No costs. St /. L. VIJAYA ASS STANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI D BALA KISHAN RAO, Advocate ( :] [OPL 2. One CC to SC FOR ZP&jVP Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES ll, High Court For I t - e State of at Hyderabad, [OUT] 4 Two CD Copies PVL/PVL HIGH COURT DATED:3011012025 I ( o o o I t t * ORDER * I TC : WP(TR). No. 3278 of 2017 DrsMrsstNG THE WR|T PETIT|ON(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS e9 c *
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.