Bangaru Suresh v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SUJANA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-11. Bangaru Suresh v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 15938 OF 2025 Between: Bangaru Suresh, S/o Sammaiah Aged about 25 Yrs, Occ. Private Employee R/o H. No. 8-23 and 24, Flat No. 307, D. B. R. Enclave, Maithrinagar, Pochamma Basthi, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad N/o H. No. 5-64, Yadava Veedhi Buddaram, Ganapuram (M), Jayashankar Bhupalapally District, Telangana State ... Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad through PS Makakpet ... RespondenUComplainant Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Enlarge the petitioner/Accused herein on bail in connection with in Crime No 21 of 2025 in SC POCSO No. 217 of 2O2O of P. S.
Malakpet on the file of Special Sessions Judge for Trial of cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Cases -Cum- Xll Additional ' Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr NARRI SWAMY, Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr D. ARUN KUMAR, the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the sole Respondent. F] The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No. tS938 of 2O2S DATE: 11. L2. 2O25 Between: Bangaru Suresh Petitioner/accused AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad, Through PS Malakpet.
Respondent ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Sections 4go & 4g3 of I Bharatiya Nagarik suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for ,BNSS,) short by the petitioner/accused seeking enlargement on bail in crime No. 21 of 2025 in sc. (PocSo). No. 2 rr of 2o2o of Malakpet police station, on the lile of learned Special sessions Judge for Trial of cases under the Protection of children from Sexual offences Act f ( cases-cum-xll Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. The offences alleged are punishable under section 376 (2](n) of the IPC, section 6 r/w s (J) (ii) & (L) of the pocso Act, 2oL2 and. section 3 (2) (v) of the sc/sr (poA) Amendment Act, 2015. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, on 2l. or.
2o2o, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that she was blessed with 4 children and she observed that from the last 1o days her younger daughter was coming late from the school and when she along with her husband asked her the reason, she informed them that the petitioner herein in the narne of love physically exploited her several times and also threatened her not to reveal to anyone. Hence, she requested for necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case for the above said offences. 3. Heard Sri Narry swamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional public prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. a 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is accused in sc. (pocso). No.
2lz of 2o2o, wherein, the trial court had dismissed the bail petition of the petitioner, on the ground that, he has regularly not attended the trial court I \ I 7 3 and this is the 4th time NBW was issued against the petitioner and on execution of the same, he was remanded to the judicial custody on 08. LO. 2O25. Hence, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition. 5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the evidence of PWs 1 to 14 were already recorded and if the petitioner is released on bail, again there is every chance of absconding from the trial Court and prayed to dismiss this petition. 6. Considering the submissions made by both the learned counsel and the material on record, this Criminal Petition is disposed of directing the trial Court to dispose of the matter at the earliest, in accordance with law.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/. U. SUDHA ANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 Special Sessions Judge ffg for Trial of cases under the Protection of children from sexual offences Act cases -cum-xll Aooltionii Sessions Judge, Hyderabad 2 The I Additional Metropolitan sessions Judge, secunderabad. 3. The Central Prison, Chandhalguda, Hyderabad. C. tt-L +. The Statron House Officer, Malakpet Police Station, Hyderabad City 5. Two CCs t9 the. P_ublic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 6. One CC to Mr. NARRI SWAMY, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD CoPies \ Rc/pr EY--% I I l,l -2 HIGH COURT DATED i 1111212025 I t 'tH I '-r. '. \ t i. _,. r o ORDER 0 0 JAN 2rr2u of 2025 CRLP. No. 15938 * t this Criminal AccordinglY, of' Petition is DisPosed KS rfza 5f F]
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.