Sri Rajarajeswari Infra and Ventures Private Ltd v. R.R. Pasura Constructions LLP

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K.LAKSHMAN

Judgment date: 2026-04-17

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-17. Sri Rajarajeswari Infra and Ventures Private Ltd v. R.R. Pasura Constructions LLP. Read the...

Judgment text

t 3168I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: '163 OF 2025 Between: 1. Sri Rajaraleswari lnfra and Ventures Private Ltd, Formerly Known as Raia Rajeswari Associates (a company incorporated under Companies Act 2013) Rep. , by its Director, Sri Ajay Chauhan, S/o, P. G Chauhan,R/o. Plot No. '130, Uma Residency, Netaji Nagar Colony, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad. 2. Anand Prabat Co. Operative Housing Society Ltd, Rep,, by its Secretary, Sri Malka Yasasvi, S/o, Malka Komaraiah,R/o. - Plot No. 105, Balamrai Society, Mahendra Hills, East Marredpally, Secunderabad 3. Gurucharan Singh, S/o. late Nand Singh R/o. Plot No. 400, Rd. No. 14, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. 4. Shailender Singh, S/o. Gurucharan Singh R/o. H. No. 3-5-77, Rajmohalla, Narayanguda Hyderabad. 5. Manmeet Singh, Sio. Gurucharan Singh R/o. H. No.

3-5-77, Rajmohalla, Narayanguda Hyderabad 6. Smt. Charanjeeth Kour, Wo. Gurucharan Singh Rl/o. Plot No. 400, Rd. No. 14, Banjara Hills Hyderabad. 7. T. AdiRarayana, s/o. T. Narsirnha Rao R/o. H. No. 1- 10-74, Ashoknagar, Hyderabad. ... Applicants AND 1. R. R. Pasura Constructions LLP, (a limited liability partnership firm) Rep. , by its Designated Partners having its Regd. Office at Plot No. 9-'t-897/1 19/1 Plot No. 11-A, 4th Floor, Amsri Eden Square Besides Apollo Hospital, St. Jhons Road Hyderabad - 500 003. 2. Venkata Subrahmanyam Rajaram Chittuluru, S/o. Sri C. V. Satyanarayana Shetty Designated Partner, R. R. Pasura Construction LLP Regd. Office at Plot No. 9-1-897111911 Plot No. 'l 1-A, 4th Floor,Amsri Eden Square Besides Apollo Hospital, St. Jhon's Road Hyderabad - 500 003 3. Prashanth Kumar Pabbati, S/o. Pabbati Venkata Mohan Rao Designated Partner R R. Pasura Construction LLP Regd. Office at Plot No. 9-1-897/1 19/1 Plot No.

11-A, 4th Floor, Amsri Eden Square Besides Apollo Hospital, St. Jhon's Road Hyderabad - 500 003 4. Nisha Agarwal, Wo. Sanjay Kumar R/ o. H. No. 1-2-398/ 1, Domalguda Hyderabad 5. Rekha Agarwal. Wo. Pavan Kumar Agarwal R/o. H. No. 1-1 1iA, Bhavani Colony Ralendra Nagar, Hyderabad 6. Kanta Devi, Wo. Lakshmi Prasad Ji R/o. H. No. 1--10-98/10, Dwarakadas Colony Begumpet, Hyderabad ... Respondents Arbitration Application under Section 11(4) & (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 RAr'r' Scheme for Appointment of Arbitrators, 2006 praying that the High Court may be pleased to appoint Nominee arbitrators on behalf of Respondents 1 to 3 for reasonable fee to resolve the dispute between the applicants and Respondents 1 to 3 in relation to the registered Development agreement Cum General power of attorney bearing document No. 5415 of 2019 date 03-04-2019 for Development of 12551 Sq.

yds situated at Shaikpet Village, Banjarahills, Hyderabad and to direct both the Nominee Arbitrators appointed on behalf of Applicants and Respondents 1 to 3, to appoint a presiding Arbitrator. 1. A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive additional affidavit in Arbitration Application No. 163 of 2025. Counsel for the Applicants: Sri P Raghavendra Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sri E Ajay Reddy, Senior Counsel representing Ms E Anisha Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER i _j 1 IN THE HIGH COURT I. 'OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA A1': IIYDERABAT) IION'BLE SIII JUSTICE K. I,AKSHMAN ARBITRATION APPL ICATION No. 163 OF 2025 Date:17-04-2026 Between: Sri Rajarajeswari Infra and Vcnrures Private Limited and others, . . . Applicants And R. R. Pasura Constructions I-l. P and others . . Respondents This Court passed the follorving:- ORDER Heard Mr. P.

Raghavcndra ltao, learned couusel for the Applicants and Sri E. Ajay Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. E. Anisha Reddy, appearing for respor-rdents. 2. The present Arbirrarion Apptication is filed under Section I I (4) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation . the Act, 1996 (hereinafter Act, 1996') for appointment of Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the panies. I 2 3. Both thc applicarrt and the respondcnts have entered into a registered Joint Developuteut Agreement cunl General Power of Attorney (for short, 'JDA - cun. r - GPA') bcaring document No. 5415 of 201 9 dated 03. 04. 2() I 9 on specific terms and conditions mentioned tehrein for developmcnt o1-the following tandcd property:- "Immovable propertv bcing land nrcasuline 12551 square yards, comprising of (a) PIor No. l. nrcasur. ins 193. 00 sqnnlq yards. (bi plot No. 4, measuring 1001. 00 stluarc rards- c) Plot No. l. adrneasuring g07. 00 square yards, (d) [,lot No. 23, rrcasuring 157(r. _.

i I sqr ar. e yards, ({) plot No. 26, measuring 990. 3 sq uarc 1 ards. (c ) Plot No. 27, ntcasLrring g 143 5. I square yards, (f Plot No. 28, measr-,rirrg ti25. 2a, (g) plor No. i8. rneasuring 2020. 02 square yards. (h) ['lot No. . 11. mcasuring -i]4. 00 squ. rrc yards, (i) plot No. zl4, measuring 1464 square vards. and () I)lot No. . 16. measuring 1704. 2g square yards, Survey No. 129lll Paiki (old Survo. No. tl9/llQ nn6 94) bearing House Nurnber 8-2-)69,l and li-2-269/2 ot' Shaikpcr village. Banjara tlills, Hyderabad, Telangana and houndcd on: Norlh by : Indira Nagar. Sottth b1' : Nciqltbotrrs l)lot. East by : Neighbours \\ cst by : Road" Clause l7 of the said agrccmcnt dcals with thc disputc resolution, it is relevant and extracted below:- CLAUSE, l7: GOVERNIN(; LAw AND DISpttTE RESOLUTION 17. 1. This Agrcement slrall bc interpreted. construcd and governed by the larvs of I nd ia. 17. 2.

Any dispute arisin-r bctween the parrics under this Agrecment, including, but not lintitetl to disputc as to its existence. validity ofany provisions, enft)rcetrcnt olthc rights and oblieations olthe Irarties or any i i q r$&t. ,: 3 in matters incidental thereto' shall bc rcferred to binding arbitration t't:'tt" Arbitration and Conciliation Act' accordance with the p'o"itionl arbitral panel shall comprise 3 r'ont tinl'I tJ ;'rn;'iil 1996, as amended the 2 (two) rhe Parties'and uppointta by (three) arbitrator'' t (o"r "]u.. l"n third arbitrator' who uppoint. th. e lr'"t*"liii"rL arbitrators appointed shall be ^ panel' All proceedings shall be the Chairman "':tn"'"'ou*f conducted in English' I-ht ;;'';;i;i" i'bit'ution shall be at Hvderabad' The decision of ttt" utUittotoi' liutt be finat and binding on the Parties' dispute above heing the mode of 17. 3.

Subject to arbitratiort as spccilied jurisdiction to shall harc cxclusive Coufls if resolution' the va*^uta '' arising out or any other matter t'iii try and or entertain utr ""'p''ints th is Agrecmcnt' oior touching or concerning the therc are disputes between thc applicants' 4. According to of rvith rcgard to the development the resporrdcnts applicants and dated 03'04'2019' - cum - GPA thc said JDA property covered under proposing 23 issued notice dated '04 '2025 applicants have Therefore, the erstwhile High Court of l'ortrcr Judge of C. V'Ramulu' Sri Justice the respondents to their arbitrator and requested Andhra Pradesh as i of the clause their Arbitrator as per No'17'02 jointly nominate/appoint to appoint a the arbitrators cnabling both 03'04'20t9 agreement dated l disPutes' DesPite resolve the arbitrator to third arbitrator/presiding did not resPond' the notice, respondents receiving and acknowledging present application' applicants filed thc Therefore, the I \ ! 4 5.

It is apt to,otc that as per the aforcsaid crause No. 17, both the parties have agreed lbr aplointtnent of a pancl of thr. ec arbitrators, one each appointed by the part ies and the two ar. bitrators appointed by the parties shall appoint the third arbitraror, who shalr be the chairman of the arbitrar tribunal' Both the lcanred counscr ror the appricants and senior counsel appearing lor respondents agreed lor appointment of sole arbitrator. Despite clause No. 17. 2 olthc sub. jcct JDA - cum - GpA dated 03. 04. 20 t9 6. Thus, the aforesaid lacts would r. o,eal that there are disputes between the applicants and the rcspondents with regard to the development of the subfect properly covcred under the said JDA -cum _ GPA dated 03. 04. 2019.. I-he sar. ne are arbitrablc in naturc. 7 rn the light of tl. re aroresaid discussion, the present Arbitration Application is allowcd. Accordingll,. , Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India, I,lot No. l93, Rd. No. I0 C, M. l,.

As & M. l,s Colony, Jubilce llills, Ilydcrabad-33, Mobile No. 9866545058 is appointed as sole Ar. bitrator to adjudicare the disputes l 5 between the pa(ies. The panies are at liberty to take all the available pleas and defences before lhc learned sole Arbitrator. Consequcntly, miscellaneous petitions, periding . .. il any, in this Arbitration Application, shall stand closed. Sd/- T. KRISHNA KUMAR JOINT REGISTRA //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To '1. Sri Justice R Subhash Redd y, Former Judge, Su Court of lndia, plot No. 193, Rd. No. 10 C M. L As & M. Ps Colony, Jub Hills, Hyderabad-33, Mobile No. 98665450 58 (By Special Messenger XAI ong with a Copy affidavit and mate of rial pape rs) 2. One CC to p Sri Raghavendra Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC io Ms E Anisha Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl 4. Two CD Copies w Sa,/pr HIGH COURT KL, J DATED: 1710412026 ,O 1 ) I I ORDER ARBAPPL. No. 163 of 2025 ALLOWING THE ARBITRATION APPLICATION Gc "t-. Jt )"*

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.