C S UMESH v. T V GANGARAJU
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2020-03-04. C S UMESH v. T V GANGARAJU. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU th DATED THIS THE 4 DAY OF MARCH, 2020 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ REVIEW PETITION NO. 535 OF 2019 IN WRIT APPEAL No. 683/2018 (LR) BETWEEN: C. S. UMESH S/O SIDDAVERAPPA AGED 49 YEARS, R/A CHIKKAVEERAIAHNAPALYA, THAVAREKEREK POST BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-562 130. … PETITIONER (BY SHRI VIRUPAKSHAIAH P. H. , ADVOCATE) AND: 1. T. V. GANGARAJU S/O LATE T. K. VEERAKEMPEGOWDA AGED 66 YEARS. 2. T. V. SIDDAPPA S/O LATE T. K. VEERAKEMPEGOWDA AGED 61 YEARS. 3. T. V. SIDDARAJU S/O LATE T. K. VEERAKEMPEGOWDA AGED 54 YEARS. 4. T. V. KEMAPAIAH S/O LATE T. K. VEERAKEMPEGOWDA AGED 53 YEARS. 5. T. V. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE T. K. VEERAKEMPEGOWDA AGED 61 YEARS. RESPONDENT Nos. 1 TO 5 ARE R/AT THAVAREKEREK POST BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-562 130. 6. SMT. GANGAMMA W/O LATE SIDDAVERAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY L. Rs. : (a) SMT. JAYAMMA AGED 60 YEARS W/O LATE SIDDALINGAPPA. (b) SMT.
BHAGYAMMA AGED 65 YHEARS D/O LATE SIDDAVEERAIAH (c) SRI VEERABHADRAIAH AGED 63 YEARS S/O LATE SIDDAVEERAIAH (d) SRI MARULARADHYA AGED 61 YEARS S/O LATE SIDDAVEERAIAH L. Rs. OF RESPONDENT No. 6 ARE R/AT CHIKKAVEERAIAHNAPALYA THAVAREKERE POST BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-562 130. 7. THE CHAIRMAN LAND TRIBUNAL BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 009. … RESPONDENTS --- THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 r/w SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN W. A. No. 683/2018 (LR) AND REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 11. 09. 2019 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT BY DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL FILED BY THE RESPONDENT Nos. 1 TO 5 HEREIN, AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Even otherwise, there is no ground for review. The review petition is, therefore, rejected.
Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE vgh*
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.