C. Shiva Arjun v. Sri, Anurag Kumar
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: PULLA KARTHIK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-19. C. Shiva Arjun v. Sri, Anurag Kumar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3301 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECETVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1356 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein forwillfully violating the Orders of the High Court dated 06. 02. 2025 passed in W. P. No . 25267 of 2018. Between: C. Shiva Arjun, S/o C. Krishna, Aged about 38years, Occ. Ex-ECIL Employee, R/o H,No. 4S-St 1, Hanuman Nagar, Near RTC Colony, Moula Ali, Hyderabad - 500040. ... PETITIONER AND 1. Sri Anurag Kumar, The Chairman and Managing Director, Electronics Corporation of lndia Limited (ECIL), Hyderabad. 2. Sri, Anurag Kumar, The Deputy General Manager (Recruitment), Personnel Group, Ele-ctronics Corporation of lndia Limited (ECIL), Hyderabad. ...
RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 oF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to furnish the certified copy of the result/marks obtained by the Petitioner in the Tradesman-B written examination conducted on 11t03t2}18 (Hall Ticket No, 11015608), forthwith; Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. Anupriya Sethi Counsel for the Respondents: Sri D. Srinivas (Standing Counset for ECIL) The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT lrOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TI]:E HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK CONTEMPT CASE No. 1356 of 2025 THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TIryO THOUSAND AND TIVENTY FTVE Between: \ C. Shiva Arjrrn I I Petitioner AND Sri Anurag I(umar, Chairman and Managing Director, Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. , (-ICIL), Hyderabad & another. Respondenrs ORDER: Allegi,g willfur disobedience of the order passed by this court in w. P. No.
252(i7 of 2018 dated 6. 2. 2o2,s, and seeking to punish rhe contemnors /respondents, this Contempt Case is filed. 2. None ;rppeared for the petitioner 3. The l:arned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the order of this court dated 6. 2. 2o2s in w. p. No . 2s26T of I l, \ 2 \ 2025 has been complied with by the respondents by passing a speaking order dated 21. 4. 2025 3. Recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. However, petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the said order dated 21. 4. 2025. if so advised. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No costs. SD/- P CH NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPUry REGISTRAR 6 \ /TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Ms. Anupriya Sethi, Advocate tOpUCl 2. one cc to sri D. srinivas (standing counsetfor ECtL) topucl 3. Two CD Copies VT{/ABK a f I HIGH COURT I DATED i '1911212025 I I 'rry' THE S Ta, i t . ) 2 7 FIB 2t]26 ORDER * * ^^or. CC. No. 13i56 of 2025 CLOSING THE CC
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.