SMT Y MONARAMANI v. SRI S NOVA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: V SRISHANANDA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-30. SMT Y MONARAMANI v. SRI S NOVA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CRL. RP No. 1556 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 30 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1556 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SMT. Y. MONARAMANI W/O RAJAN AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, ND R/O 2 BLOCK, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, BETHAMANGALA VILLAGE, POST AND HOBLI, K G F TALUK - 563 113. …PETITIONER (BY SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K. , ADVOCATE) AND: SRI S NOVA S/O SAMUEL AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, ND R/O 2 BLOCK, Digitally signed AMBEDKAR NAGAR, by ANUSHA V BETHAMANGALA VILLAGE, Location: High POST AND HOBLI, Court of K G F TALUK - 563 113. Karnataka …RESPONDENT (BY SRI SHIVA REDDY K. P. , ADVOCATE FOR SRI N. S. SHESHADRI, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL. RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR. P. C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO SET ASIDE TE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 11. 11. 2021 IN C. C. NO. 770/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KGF AND JUDGMENT DATED 07. 05. 2022 IN - 2 - CRL. RP No.
1556 of 2022 CRL. A. NO. 60/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF). THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR HEARING ON I. A. , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is present before the Court. After addressing the arguments for sometime, Sri Chandrasekhar K. , learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo and it reads as under: "MEMO The Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is ready to pay the balance amount of Rs. 1,02,500/- (One lakh Two Thousand five Hundred only) within six months from today i. e. , 30/04/2026 in the interest of justice and equity. " 2. Sri Shiva Reddy K. P. , learned counsel appearing for the respondent has endorsed no objection. 3. Placing the memo on record, the petition stands disposed of. - 3 - CRL. RP No. 1556 of 2022 4. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. 5.
It is made clear that if the compensation amount as agreed in the memo is not paid, the petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate and confirmed by the first Appellate Court. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AV List No. : 2 Sl No. : 18
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.