Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Jaffar Ali Moosvi v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-16. Jaffar Ali Moosvi v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 3183 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOUR,ABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 30380 OF 2024 Between: Jaffar Ali Moosvi, S/ O Mir Abid Ali Moosvi , Age 35 Years, Occ. Pvt Emp' R/O . 17-3-433167 Ganga Nagar Yakuthpura Hyderabad.. ... PETITIONER AND 'l . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Deoartment. TS Secretariat. Hvderabad. 2. Stdtion House Officer, Malakp'et Police Station, Malakpet Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Police to.

refrain from calling the petitioner to the police station from the number to without a valid reason and or justification is as lllegal, arbitrary malafide and violation of principles of natural justice in accordance with the Supreme Court's guidelines established in ARNESH KUMAR V. STATE OF BIHAR. refrain from any actions that violate the petitioner's fundamental right to personal liberty and his right to be treated with dignity ,respect as enshrined in Article 2'l of the Constitution of lndia lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim order directing the Respondent Police to refrain from harassing the petitioners, or interfering in civil disputes. The Respondent Police are further directed to adhere to due process of law in all interactions with the petitioners.

The Hon'ble Court may pass such other orders or directives as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MD FASIUDDIN Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER t HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 30380 OF 2024 ORDER:(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequent to filing of this writ petition, notice under Section 41-A Cr. P. C was served on the petitioner in connection with FlR. No. 372 of 2024 of tVlalakpet Police Station and the petitioner has also taken steps by filing Criminal Petition No. 14236 of 2Q24 seeking quashment of the said FlR, as such, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. Recording the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed. SD/-V.

KAVITHA ASSIST REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S CTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, TS \ Secretariat, Hyderabad. I 2. Statiorrtl o up_pf i. c_e po I ice Station, 1 ! {a. lqkp_et Ma la kpet Hydera bad. ' 3. One CC to SRl. MD FASIUDDIN, Advocate IOPUCI 4. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court forihe Staie of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies BM HIGH COURT ( BVR,J DATED:1611212024 1 HE T4 o r O4 t rEB 2l//5 ? * ORDER WP. No. 30380 of 2024 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS @ W

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.