GAUTAM SINGH v. DENANSH YADAV DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KISHTWAR
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-07-01. GAUTAM SINGH v. DENANSH YADAV DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KISHTWAR. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Sr. No. 15 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(D) No. 24/2024 In WP(C) No. 2681/2022 Gautam Singh, Age 72 years …. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) S/O Late Anant Ram, R/O Lachkhazana Kuleed, Tehsil and District Kisthwar. Through :- Mr. Touseef Zargar, Advocate vice Mr. N D Qazi, Advocate. V/s Dr. Devansh Yadav …. Respondent(s) Deputy Commissioner, Kistwar Through :- Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE ORDER 01. 07. 2024 1. The contempt petition has been filed for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondent for willfully violating the order dated 13. 12. 2022 passed in WP(C) No. 2681/2022 titled ‘Gautam Singh v. UT of J&K & Ors. ’ 2. The operative portion of the order dated 13. 12. 2022 reads as under: “In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.
2 to decide the representation stated to have been filed by the petitioner expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date copy of this order and representation made by the petitioner is served upon the respondent no. 2. ” 3. Statement of facts have been filed contending therein that while complying with the directions passed by this court dated 13. 12. 2022, the representation filed by the petitioner has been considered and a speaking order dated 28. 04. 2023 has been passed whereby the claim of the petitioner is found devoid of any merits as per rules and, accordingly, the same has been rejected. 4. In view of the statement of facts filed by the respondent, nothing survives for adjudication in the present contempt petition and proceedings in the contempt petition are accordingly closed. 5. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order dated 28. 04. 2023 if cause survives. ) (Puneet Gupta) (Tashi Rabstan) Jammu: Judge Judge 01. 07.
2024 Raj Kumar Raj Kumar 2024. 07. 02 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.