K.S.GIRIJAMMA v. VIKRAMAN
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2026-06-16. K.S.GIRIJAMMA v. VIKRAMAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN TH MONDAY, THE 11 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1945 RFA NO. 540 OF 2006 THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 07. 12. 2005 IN OS NO. 21 OF 1999 OF SUB COURT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA APPELLANTS / DEFENDANTS 2 TO 4: K. S. GIRIJAMMA D/O. LAKSHMI, AGED 39 YEARS, AJITH BHAVAN, MOTHIRAVAYAL, KARIKULAM MURI, PAZHAVANGADIKKARA VILLAGE, RANNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. PARVATHI BHAI D/O. K. S. GIRIJAMMA, AGED 15 YEARS, AJITH BHAVAN, MOTHIRAVAYAL, KARIKULAM MURI, PAZHAVANGADIKKARA, VILLAGE, RANNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. ASWATHI D/O. K. S. GIRIJAMMA, AGED 12 YEARS, AJITH BHAVAN, MOTHIRAVAYAL, KARIKULAM MURI, PAZHAVANGADIKKARA VILLAGE, RANNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. (THE MINORS APPELLANTS 2, AND 3 ARE REP. BY THEIR GUARDIAN APPELLANT 1) BY ADVS. SRI. M. NARENDRA KUMAR SRI. M. P. MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENTS / PLAINTIFF & 1ST DEFENDANT: VIKRAMAN, S/O.
NARAYANAN, AGED 61 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT KANANILKKUNNATHIL, MUKKALUMON, PAZHAVANGADIKKARA MURI AND VILLAGE, RANNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. V. AJITHKUMAR, S/O. VASU AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, (DIED), BUSINESS, RESIDING AT AJITH BHAVAN,, MOTHIRAVAYAL, KARIKULAM MURI, PAZHAVANGADIKKARA MURI AND VILLAGE, RANNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. IT IS RECORDED THAT 'APPELANTS ARE THE LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SECOND RESPONDENT VIDE ORDER DATED 01/07/2019 IN R. F. A. No. 540 of 2006 -: 2 :- MEMO DATED 28. 05. 2019. BY ADV SRI. JACOB P. ALEX THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 11. 03. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. F. A. No. 540 of 2006 -: 3 :- Sathish Ninan, J. ============================== R. F. A. No. 540 of 2006 ========================== th Dated this the 11 day of March, 2024 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants reports no instructions from the party. The Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge rsr
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.