MOHAMMAD NAUSHAD ALIAS SP v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-11-14. MOHAMMAD NAUSHAD ALIAS SP v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3570 of 2024 Mohammad Naushad @ S. P. @ Naushad Ansari, son of Dos Mohammad, resident of Village- Bansimi, P. O. - Baracharpa, P. S. - Margomunda, District- Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. … Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Shyam Sunder Pd. Kushwaha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, A. P. P. Order No. 06 Dated: 14. 11. 2024 The petitioner apprehending his arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 414/419/420/467/468/471/120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(B)/66(C)/66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F. I. R.
The petitioner has been roped in the present case merely on the basis of alleged confessional statement of co-accused- Osama Ansari. Except the said fact, there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. The petitioner is not involved in cyber-crime as has been alleged. He, however, undertakes to co-operate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, he may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. 3. Learned A. P. P. though opposes the petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail, however while referring to paragraph-13 of the counter affidavit, submits that as per the ICJS portal, no criminal antecedent of the petitioner has been found. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the materials available on record, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. 5.
Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within three weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih in connection with Giridih (Cyber) P. S. Case No. 34 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P. C. Ritesh/ (Rajesh Shankar, J. ) 2 A. B. A. No. 3570 of 2024
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.