M/s Robo Silicon Private Limited v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-02-18. M/s Robo Silicon Private Limited v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
[ 31661 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 4727 OF 2025 Between: M/s Robo Silicon Private Limited, 4O2, 4lh Floor, Sri Durga Towers, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034. Represented by its General Manager (Legal) Mr. Sreekanth Palateerdhapu ... PETITIONER AND t' 1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, lndustries and Commerce Dept. (Mines and Geology), Hyderabad, Telangana 2. The Director of Mines and Geology, Hyderabad, Telangana 3. The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, Telangana 4. The Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Hyderabad, Telangana ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or a direction, particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, Declaring the inaction of the Respondents in hearing or disposing off the revision and stay applications filed by the petitioner under S. 35-A of the TMMC Rules, 1966, as illegal and unconstitutional and in stark violation of Articles 14, 19 (1) (a) and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution. of lndia and the principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the official respondents to decide and pass orders after hearing the revision and interlocutory applications filed by the petitioners on merits in accordance with law IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the Demand Notice No.
36/S/2010, daled 16. 12. 2024, till the time the official respondents, hear and dispose of the revision application filed by the petitioners, in accordance with law IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the Circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to allow -lf e petitioners to continue its mining operations in Survey No. 345 of Girmapur Village, Medchal Mandal, Medchal - Malkalgiri District, Admeasuring Ac. 5. 00, thereby directing department to continue issuing dispatch permits, till the time the revision application is not properly'heard or disposed off in accordance with law Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N. JEEVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY The Court made the following: ORDER a SRI JUSTICE T. VTNOD KUMAR THE HON'BLE TITION No.
4727 2025 WRIT PE of ORDER: for petitioner and leamed Heard leamed counsel for Mines and Geology appearing on behalf of Govemment Pleader the consent of leamed respondents, and perused the record' With Counsel for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission. 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner. in brief, is that aggrieved by the demand notice dated 16-12-2024, it had filed a Revision under Rule 35-A of the Telangana Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 (lor short 'the Rules') on 2O-Ol-2025 to the Government and the said Revision is pending for consideration as of date' 3.
Petitioner further contends that on account of issuing demand notice demanding normal seigniorage fee and 5 times penalty, the respondent authorities are not allowing the petitioner to generate/obtain dispatch/transport permit, and thus, seeks for a direction to respondents to dispose of the Revision at the earliest Pleader appearing on behalf 4. Per contra. learned Government were direct submit that if this Court to the of respondents would the Revision in a timc bound respondent authorities to dispose of manner. theatrthoritieswouldabidebythedirectionasmaybe (lourt. issued by tl. r is respective contentions urged 5 I have taken note of having the demantt notice' petitioner, aggrieved by 6 Since, the with the Rule 3 5-A of the Rules filed a Revision under is 2O-Ol-2025, this Court of the view that l't respondent-State on without expressing an1' opinion on the merits of the matter' the respondent authorities are to be directed to dispose of the Revision in a time bound manner. 1.
Accordingty, the 1'1 respondent is hereby dirccted to dispose of the Revision preferred by the petitioner on 20-01-2025 within a period ofeight (08) weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order 8 Sub. ]ecr to above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed oi No costs ry ) 9. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed SD/-K. SREE RAMA MURTHY AS ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, \ Dept' (Mines and 1. The Principal Secretary, lndustries and Commerce Geology), Hyderabad, Telangana Z. ine Diri#toiof Mines. and Geology, Hyderabad, Telangana e. fi. ie Aiststrnt Director of Mines aiid G-eotogy, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, Telanoana 4 The Dtoutv Director of Mines and Geology, Hyderabad, Telangana s. on6 cC to', sRl. N. JEEVAN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUCI 6: i;; ccs-io-cF FoR MiNES-A-Nij bEoLocV,ti'gn court forthe state or Telangana at HYderabad [OUT] 7. Two CD CoPies BM BS s 1 I ) HIGH COURT DATED:1810212025 itHe:r..
r € o ( a- 6 'J o O 11ilAn M e . \ 4'. * * D,1 (\1 SpATC! l ORDER WP. No. 4727 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @,P91'r W-
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.