SHAIK YOUSUF ALI v. HUMAYUN BEGUM AND 15 OTHERS
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: G SRI DEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-14. SHAIK YOUSUF ALI v. HUMAYUN BEGUM AND 15 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD IVONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4427 OF 2018 Petition under Arlicle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 2710312018 in lA No. 2276l2017 in OS No,2B1l2006 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, RR District at L. B. Nagar. Between: Shaik Yousuf Ali, Sio. Late Shaik Mehdi Aii, R/o. H. NO. 22-7-26911, Deewan Devdi Charminar, Hyderabad. Represented by his G. P. A. Mohammed Abdus Samad, '16-2-8671A12, S/o. Mohammed Ayub, Rl/o. H. No. Jeevanyarjung Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad, T. S. , ... PETITIONER AND 1. Humayun Begum, Wo. Late Agha Syed Abbas, .... RespondenU Plaintiff 2. Yalal Malla Reddy, S/o. Sukka Reddy, 3. Yalal Yadhava Reddy @ Yadi Reddy, S/o. Sukka Reddy, 4. Yala Mohan Reddy, S/o. Sukka Reddy, 5. Jana Chaitanya Housing Society Limited, Ameerpet, Hyderabad- 16, by its IV. D. Sri. tr/.
Sudhakar, S/o. Not Known to Petitioner, R/o. H. NO. 6-3-802, ll Floor, Zainab Complex, Ameerpet 'X' Roads, Hyderabad-16 6. Smt. Y. Laxmamma, W/o. Late Ramakrishna Reddy, 7. Venkat Reddy, S/o. Late Rama Krishna Reddy, 8. Narsimha Reddy, S/o. Late Late Rama Krishna Reddy, 9. Suman Reddy, S/o. Late Ramakrishna Reddy, (Respondents No. 7 to I are the LRs of Late Ramakrishan Reddy, Rio. H. No. 2- 2-75, UpparpallyVillage, R. R. District) 10. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 11. The R. D. O, West Division, Athapur Village, Rajendranagar, R. R. District 12. The l\/. R. O. , Rajendrangar Mandal R. R. District 13. The Commissioner, Survey Settlements and Lands Records, Abids, Hyderabad. 14. The Chairman, HUDA, Rasulpura, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 1 5. The Sub-Registrar, Rajendranagar, R. R. District 16. The District Registrar, Registration and Stamps, Moosapet, R. R, District ...
RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS. No. 28112006 on the file of the Hon'ble Court of the Principal District Judge, R. R. District at LB Nagar. For the Petitioner : SRl. MUHAMMAD VEQAR HUSSAIN, Advocate Forthe Respondent Nos. 11 to 13 and 15, 16 : THE GP FOR ARBITRATION For the Respondent No. 14 : The Court. made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 4427 OF 20 18 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner u,ould submit that the cause in this revision does not survive further adjudication and the revision has become inlructuous. in that view of the matter, recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Misceilaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed. Sd/-B,SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGI R ,TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER To 1.
The Principal District Judge, RR District. 2. Two CCs to the GP for Arbitration, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT) 3. One CC to Sri lvluhammed Veqar Hussain, Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies Kj ta-rY HIGH COURT DATED:1411212020 1 $? s TA o '2. 29DECM ,9 ,,, * r-: a-' ORDER CRP. No. 4427 ot 2018 Dismissing the CRP as infructuous. C ^\r-o ltlt/
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.