Chingakham Onindro Singh v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-10-25. Chingakham Onindro Singh v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Digitally signed by JOHN JOHN TELEN KOM Date: 2024. 10. 25 TELEN KOM 16:23:29 +05'30' Item No. 81 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C)No. 688 of 2024 Chingakham Onindo Singh …Petitioner - Versus- Union of India & Anr. …Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA O R D E R 25. 10. 2024. [1] Heard Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. N. Savitri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, learned counsel for respondent No. 2. [2] The petitioner is a Contractual Staff Manipur University working as Junior Assistant-cum-typist since 2008 and his contractual service has been extended from time to time. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 24. 03. 2022 for regularization of his service. [3] It is pointed out that a 5(five) members committee was constituted to examine the issue of the regularization of the contractual and ad hoc staff of MU. It is also pointed out that vide order dated 21. 10.
2024 passed by this Court in WP(C)No. 739 of 2024, this Court directed the 5(five) members to pass a speaking order with respect to the representation therein for regularization of the contractual staff. [4] Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this matter can be disposed of in light of the direction given in the order dated 21. 10. 2024. [5] Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, learned counsel for the Manipur University, submits that the Committee is considering the representation and similar direction may be passed in the present writ petition. [6] Recording the submissions made at the bar with the limited prayer made in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the 5(five) members Committee to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization along with the prayer for similarly situated persons. [7] With the above observation, writ petition is disposed of.
[8] It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case. [9] Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for the parties in the course of the day. JUDGE John Kom
Source: High Court of Manipur. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.