M.Narsing Rao, v. State of Telangana,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-03. M.Narsing Rao, v. State of Telangana,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 40716 OF 2015 Between: I M. Narsing Rao, Sio. M. Kanthiah, Aged about. 44 years, Occ: Business, R/o. 13-3-665/1, Ranganath Nagar, Jiyaguda, Hyderabad-500 006. ... PETITIONER AND 1. State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Endowments, Boggulkunta, Hyderabad. J. The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad District, Boggulkunta. 4. Sri Ranganatha Swamy Temple, Rep. by Founder Family Member-s, _ Jiyagudb, Hyderabad, H. No. 13-3-661, Jiyaguda, Hyderabad- 500 006. 5. Siate of Telangana, Rep. , by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secreteriat Building, Hyderabad. 6. District Collector, Hyderabad. 7. Tahsildar, Asif Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad Revenue Division. B.
Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Hyderabad. 9. Srungaram Tiruvengala Charyulu, S/o. S. Srinivasa Qhary, Founder Family Mem-ber of Sri Rangianatha Sivamy Temple, H. No. 15-37, Kodandaram Nagar, Near P and T Colony, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad-SOO 060. Sri l0. Srungaram Shesha Chary, S/o. S. Srinivasa Chary, Pradhana Archaka of Ranginatha Swarny Teniple, H. No. 13-3-661 , Jiyaguda, Hyderabad- 500 06. 1 1 . Srungaram Narsimha Chary, S/o. S. Rama Chary, Archaka of Sri Ranganatha Swamy Temple, H. No. 13-3-661/1, Jiyaguda, Hyderabad- 500 006. l2. Srungaram Bhargavi, W/o. S. Rajagopala Chary, H. No. 13. 3-661' Jiyaguda, Hyderabad- 500 006. ... RESPONDENTS Petition underr Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a rvrit or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus. declaring the action of Respondent No.
3 in not considering the Petitioners and others memorandum dt. 2$-11-2014, subsequent representations dt. 22-12-2014 and dt. 21-04-201s as illegat, arbikary and violative of Ariicle 14, 25 of the constitution of lndia and sec 83 of the Act 30/1987 and consequentially direct the Respondent No. 3 to take appropriate steps to remove encroachments from the temple land of Respondent No. 4 temple as per sec 83 of Act 3ot1gg7 l. A. NO: 1 OF 2015 PMP. NO:5 2567 0F 2015 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 5 to 8 to stay the regurarization proceedings under G. o. Ms. No. 59 in survey No. 37 of Kursumpura Revenue Viflage, Asif Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. V. N. ACHARYA Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Gp FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.
4: SC FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent Nos. S to 8: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 9 to 12: ---- The Court made the following: ORDER ',rr::F. @r ". x HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 4O716 of 2015 I I ORDER On 02. 72. 2024, wherl the l matter was taken up for i l, hearing, none has appearecl on behalf of the petitioner and the I l matter was listed to today under the caption 'for dismissal'' Even today also, when the matter is taken up in the morning session, none appeared lor the petitioner, thereafter the matter was passed over attd taken up in the afternc-ron session, even then, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner eithcr physicaily or in virltlzrl mode. I{ence, there is no other option to this Court except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non- prosecutlcn 2. Accordingly, the Writ l)ctition is dismissed for be no ot'der as to costs' non-prosecution.
Thcre shall As sequel tc it, Misccllancous Petitions, if any pending, shall sLand dismissed SD/. K,AMMAJI ASSI TANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri D. V. N. Acharya, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Endowmehts, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hdyerabad [OUT] 3. Twir CCs to-The GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at HvderabadlOPUCI 4. Ohe CC to'SC forEndowment TOPUCI 5. Two CD Copies TJ BSR l<p, P HIGH COURT DATED:0311212024 E SIA ,-€ rtt ORDER c 5 2 o :i. ii ? i125 2 I C o WP. No. 40716 of 20'|. 5 t t gC D55. r4rC DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NONPROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS 6 eo
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.