TENGNANG J.W. MOMIN v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 6 ORS
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2025-10-16. TENGNANG J.W. MOMIN v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 6 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 19 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 363 of 2024 Date of Order: 16. 10. 2025 Shri. Tengnang J. W. Momin, S/o Shri. J. D. Shira. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong. 2. The Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Personnel & AR (B) Department, Shillong. 3. The Under Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong. 4. The Director of School Education and Literacy, Meghalaya, Shillong. 5. The Joint Director of School Education and Literacy, Meghalaya, Shillong. 6. The Joint Director of School Education and Literacy, West Garo Hills, Tura. 7. The Special Officer to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S. Deb, Adv. Ms. E. Dkhar, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. H.
Kharmih, Addl. Sr. GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. Sr. GA today submits that the State respondents have issued a SOP vide Memorandum dated 25-09-2025, wherein instructions have been laid out with regard to regularisation of adhoc employees working against sanctioned posts after December, 2007. He further submits that the claims of the petitioner will therefore necessarily have to be examined in the light of the said Memorandum. 2. Mr. S. Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner on the submissions made by Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. Sr. GA, submits that the name of the petitioner may therefore be sent for consideration under the new Memorandum, wherein the SOP is contained. 3.
On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this matter is accordingly disposed of by directing the State respondents to take up the case of the petitioner for consideration as to his eligibility for regularisation under the new SOP dated 25-09-2025. 4. Matter accordingly stands closed and disposed of. Judge Signature Not Verified 3 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2025. 10. 16 06:04:12 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.