PREETAM SINGH v. STATE OF M.P.
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-05. PREETAM SINGH v. STATE OF M.P. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE th ON THE 5 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4052 of 2010 BETWEEN:- PREETAM SINGH S/O S/O HEM SINGH , AGED ABOUT 58 YE A R S , OCCUPATION: R/O VILL. UDAYPUR,THANA BIJOLI ,DISTT. GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPLICANT (BY SHRI ARJUN SHARMA - ADVOCATE) AND STATE OF M. P. THR. PS MORAR, GWALIOR(MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI PAWAN SINGH RAGHUVANSHI - GOVT. ADVOCATE) This application coming on for direction this day, the court passed the following: ORDER This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the police authorities to file chalan in relation to Crime No. 398 of 2010 as well as to arrest the accused persons. 2.
At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor submits that the relief which has been sought by the petitioner is not maintainable in the light of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Aleque Padamsee and others Vs. Union of India and others, (2007) 6 SCC 171, Sakiri Vasu Vs. Signature Not Verified Signed by: ABDUR RAHMAN Signing time: 05-Feb-24 7:15:32 PM State of U. P. , 2008 AIR SCW 309 and Shweta Bhadauria Vs. State of M. P. And others, 2017 (1) MPJR 247 and the proper remedy available to the petitioner is to approach the competent Court of criminal jurisdiction under the provisions of section 156 (3) of Cr. P. C. , and therefore, the present petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C is not maintainable. 3 .
Countering the submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though as per the directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court the remedy available to the petitioner is before competent Court of Criminal Jurisdiction, but this Court by invoking inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr. P. C. can direct the police authorities to conduct the investigation properly and to file chalan in relation to the FIR so made by the petitioner. 4. After hearing the rival contentions, this Court finds that the issue with regard to directing the police officials to make arrest of the accused persons and file challan before the competent court of jurisdiction is no more res integra. In the judgments cited by the learned counsel for the respondent/State the issue is very well settled that such type of directions can only be given by the Judicial Magistrate of competent criminal jurisdiction under the provisions of section 156 (3) of Cr. P. C. 5 .
In the light of the aforesaid, this petition being devoid of any substance is hereby dismissed. The petitioner is at a liberty to approach the concerned Judicial Magistrate for redressal of his grievance. (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE ar Signature Not Verified Signed by: ABDUR RAHMAN Signing time: 05-Feb-24 7:15:32 PM Signature Not Verified Signed by: ABDUR RAHMAN Signing time: 05-Feb-24 7:15:32 PM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.