N. Rama v. The Tahsildar and Deputy Collector,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-11. N. Rama v. The Tahsildar and Deputy Collector,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 15044 OF 20'll Between: Smt. N. Rama, Wo. Shyamsundar Reddy Housewife Rl/o. H. No. 1-7-1641A, Golconda X Roads, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Sub lnspector of Police, Narsangi Police Station, Cyberabad, Hyderabad ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not conductang the survey and fixing the boundaries of the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 4. 10 guntas in Sy. No.
'104 of Puppalaguda Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as requested by the 2nd respondent in letter No. 67/Cr. /2011 dated 21. 03 2011 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently dlrect the 1st respondent to conduct the survey )-1 and fix boundaries of the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 4. 10 guntas in Sy. No. 104 of Puppalaguda Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District forthwith / l. A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO:18072 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to '1't direct the respondent to conduct the survey and fix boundaries of the land admeasuring an L,xtent of Ac. 4. '10 guntas in Sy. No. 104 of Puppalaguda Village, Rajendra Nagar [\4andal, Ranga Reddy District forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O. MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.
2: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER I // THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. l 5044 of 2OlL ORDER: This petition is coming for hearing since 2011. On 20. 11. 2024, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the . [or caption Dismissa]". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalt of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case. 2. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution/default. There shall be no order as to CO StS Pending miscellaneous applications, if any 1n this petition, shall stand closed. SD/. T. JA ASREE ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 One CC to SRl. -Ci O. MANOHER REDDY, Advocate IOPUCI - at Z i*o CC.
io f On REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana Hvderabad [OUT] Telangana' at :r i'lro-cbs io' cp Fon HoME, High Court for the State of Hyderabad [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies BM GJP I ({h HIGH COURT DATED:1 1112t2024 9TA r€ 1 t\E \ aa: , I o 03 u[H m6 ORDER gt ! cs: PAit-, WP. No. 150tl4 of 2011 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON. PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS (+ . ). , ,s *. Cops
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.