RABI NARAYAN DALEI v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2024-12-11. RABI NARAYAN DALEI v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 4236 of 2024 Rabi Narayan Dalei …. Petitioner Mr. Kuldeep Mohanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opp. Party Mr. S. J. Mohanty, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA Order ORDER No. 11. 12. 2024 01. 1. Pursuant to the order dated 21. 11. 2024 of this Court, the learned S. D. J. M. , Udala has submitted a report dated 09. 12. 2024, inter alia, stating as under: “Respectfully, with reference to the above noted subject, I am to submit that trial of C. T. Case No. 551/2020 arising out of Kaptipada P. S. Case No. 198/2020 has not yet commenced. Now the case is posted to 07. 01. 2025 for appearance of the accused namely Ananta Gajendra Mohapatra only out of 10 numbers of accused persons. ” 2. The petitioner is the informant in the present case and seeks indulgence of this Court for a direction for expeditious disposal of the trial.
He submits that, out of ten accused persons, nine of them are on bail and one accused person has not yet been admitted to bail. The accused persons are repeatedly seeking adjournments before the procrastinated. Therefore, finding no way out, the petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for expeditious disposal of the trial. 3. Nothing is coming to the fore on record to establish as to whether the accused persons are indeed causing delay. Without delving upon the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that, the criminal case of the present nature needs to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible, which is a constitutional mandate. 4. Therefore, the trial Court is directed to do well to see that the trial of the present case is concluded as expeditiously as possible. 5.
Neither the prosecution nor the defence shall be allowed to take unnecessary adjournments on any pretext henceforth that would curtail the further delay in the proceeding. 6. With the aforementioned observation, the CRLMC is disposed of. (S. S. Mishra) Judge Signature Not VerifiedSubhasis Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASIS MOHANTY Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 12-Dec-2024 17:26:40
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.