UNION OF INDIA AND ORS v. VIRENDER KUMAR SHARMA
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2026-02-10. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS v. VIRENDER KUMAR SHARMA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Sr. No. 23 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 2316/2025 Date of pronouncement: 10. 02. 2026 Date of uploading: 11. 02. 2026 1. Union of India th. its Secretary to Govt. of ..... Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) India, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi-110011. 2. Additional Director, General Personnel Services, Adjutant General’s Branch, Integrated HQ of Ministry of Defence (Army), DHQ PO, New Delhi-110001. 3. Principal, Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Draupadi Ghat, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh-211014. Through :- Mr. Vikas Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel v/s No. SC-00339N Col Virender Kumar Sharma, ..... Respondent(s) S/o Sh. Mulkh Raj, R/o Village Bagdal Klan, P/o Sohal, Tehsil Akhnoor, District Jammu. Through :- Mr. Rajnish Raina, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Om Goswami, Advocate Mr. P. L. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Prabhat Sangotra, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 10. 02.
2026 Sanjeev Kumar ‘J’ 1. The issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by our judgment dated 03. 11. 2025, passed in “Union of India and others Vs. Nirman Singh Jamwal” in WP(C) No. 3173/2023 along with clubbed matters, wherein the disabilities like the present one i. e. “PRIMARY HYPERTENSION” has been held aggravated by the Military services and, therefore, the personnel suffering from such disability cannot be denied the disability pension on the ground that 2 WP (C) No. 2316/2025 the disability is neither attributable to nor aggravated by the military services. That apart we have gone through the judgment passed by the Tribunal and concur with the view taken by the Tribunal that opinion of the Release Medical Board, based on its finding that the disability has occurred in the peace area and, therefore, not attributable to or aggravated by the army service, is flawed. 2. For these reasons, we find no merit in this petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Sanjay Parihar) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge JAMMU 10. 02. 2026 Vishal Sharma Whether the order is reportable? Yes/No Whether the order is speaking? Yes/No
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.