RAJBALA WIFE OF SHRI JAGDISH @ KALU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-19. RAJBALA WIFE OF SHRI JAGDISH @ KALU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Criminal Misc. Application (Suspension of Sentence) No. 2371/2024 in S. B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3349/2024 Rajbala Wife Of Shri Jagdish @ Kalu, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Chak 3 K D, Police Station Ravala, District Shriganganagar. ----Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P. p. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shantanu Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/12/2024 1. The accused-applicant/appellant has preferred the this present application for suspension of sentence under Section 430 of the B. N. S. S. , 2023. 3. As per the certificate filed under Section 311(3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules, the accused-appellant was on bail during trial and she did not misuse the liberty granted to her. 4.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the sentence awarded to the accused-applicant/appellant has already been suspended for a period of 30 days by the learned trial Court under the Provisions of Section 430 of the B. N. S. S. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application for suspension of sentence. (2 of 3) [SOSA-2371/2024] 6. Heard. 7. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the impugned judgement and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial Court. 8. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the findings given by the learned trial Court, this Court feels that it is a fit to suspend the sentence awarded to the accused-applicant/appellant. 9. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant, namely, Rajbala W/o Shri Jagdish @ Kalu in Sessions Case No.
29/2017 shall remain suspended provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court to the effect that she shall appear before the Registrar (Judl. ) on 21. 01. 2025 and further on subsequent date(s) as and when called upon to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions as follows:-i) After release of the accused appellant, she shall not indulge in any criminal activity and if it is found that she is involved in any criminal activity, the order shall be recalled. ii) She will appear before the trial Court in the month of December of every year till the appeal is decided. iii) If the appellant change the place of residence, she will give in writing her changed address to the trial Court as well as the counsel in the High Court. (3 of 3) [SOSA-2371/2024] iv).
Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court. 10. A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court through e-mail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J NEERU BALA /94
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.