OINAM SHANTIBALA DEVI v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 5 ORS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-08-14. OINAM SHANTIBALA DEVI v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 5 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Digitally signed by JOHN JOHN TELEN KOM Date: 2024. 08. 29 TELEN KOM 08:14:50 +05'30' Item No. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C)No. 562 of 2024 Smt. Oinam Shantibala Devi, aged about 67 years, W/o Irom Lalitkumar Singh, a resident of Singjamei Changamakha Irom Leikai, PO & PS Singjamei, Imphal West District, Manipur-795008. …Petitioner - Versus- The State of Manipur represented by the Secretary/Commissioner (Hr. & Tech. Education), Government of Manipur, Secretariat Building, Babupara, PO & PS Imphal, Imphal West District, Manipur-795001 & 5 Ors. …Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA O R D E R 14. 08. 2024. [1] Heard Ms. Alina, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Th. Sukumar, learned GA for the State respondents. [2] The petitioner who is working as Associate Professor, (Zoology) retired on superannuation on 28. 02. 2023 and her retirement benefit has not been released till date.
In this respect, the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 25. 07. 2024 to the respondents requesting for releasing her Gratuity and Commutation pension and it is stated that the said representation is still pending with the authority. [3] It is submitted that at this stage the writ petition can be disposed of by issuing innocuous order to the official respondents to dispose of the pending representation dated 25. 07. 2024 by a speaking order. [4] Mr. Th. Sukumar, learned GA is agreeable to the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. [5] Recording the submission made at the bar, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 25. 07. 2024 submitted by the petitioner by issuing a speaking order as per rules within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. [6] With this observations, writ petition is disposed of.
[7 ] It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case. [8] Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for the parties. JUDGE John Kom
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.